Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study

Project Overview

The document explores the integration of generative AI (GenAI), specifically large language models like ChatGPT, in higher education through a case study at Luleå University of Technology. A survey of university educators showed that more than half are utilizing GenAI, mainly for preparation tasks, highlighting its growing role in educational practices. Educators acknowledge the advantages of GenAI in improving teaching efficacy, yet they express concerns about issues such as inaccuracy and the risk of academic dishonesty. Importantly, the findings reveal a positive relationship between teachers' favorable views on the benefits of GenAI and their inclination to promote its use among students. Overall, the document underscores the transformative potential of GenAI in education while also addressing the challenges that need to be navigated for its effective implementation.

Key Applications

Generative AI (such as ChatGPT)

Context: University teachers at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.

Implementation: An online survey was distributed to teachers across multiple departments to gauge their usage and perceptions of GenAI in teaching activities.

Outcomes: 52% of teachers reported using GenAI, finding it beneficial for teaching preparation. 59% indicated it has impacted their teaching positively.

Challenges: Concerns about inaccuracies and cheating were significant, with 55% of teachers advocating for legislation around the use of GenAI.

Implementation Barriers

Ethical concerns

Teachers expressed concerns about the potential for cheating and the inaccuracies of information generated by GenAI.

Proposed Solutions: Some teachers suggested implementing guidelines on ethical usage and incorporating discussions on the limitations of GenAI in teaching.

Legislative concerns

A significant portion of teachers believe there should be legislation regarding the use of GenAI in education.

Proposed Solutions: Encouraging dialogue about appropriate usage and creating frameworks for ethical guidelines can help address these concerns.

Project Team

Jenny Pettersson

Researcher

Elias Hult

Researcher

Tim Eriksson

Researcher

Tosin Adewumi

Researcher

Contact Information

For information about the paper, please contact the authors.

Authors: Jenny Pettersson, Elias Hult, Tim Eriksson, Tosin Adewumi

Source Publication: View Original PaperLink opens in a new window

Project Contact: Dr. Jianhua Yang

LLM Model Version: gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

Analysis Provider: Openai

Let us know you agree to cookies