Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Student and AI responses to physics problems examined through the lenses of sensemaking and mechanistic reasoning

Project Overview

The document explores the transformative role of Generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, in STEM education, with an emphasis on physics problem-solving. It analyzes both student and AI-generated responses to physics questions, utilizing the frameworks of sensemaking and mechanistic reasoning. Findings indicate that AI provides structured solutions that integrate formal and everyday knowledge, showcasing its potential to enhance physics education. However, student responses exhibit iterative reasoning and representation practices, suggesting that while AI can be a valuable tool, it also has limitations in fostering critical thinking and may expose gaps in students' knowledge. Overall, the study underscores the promise of Generative AI in education while also calling attention to the need for careful integration to ensure that students develop essential reasoning skills.

Key Applications

ChatGPT for physics problem-solving

Context: Physics education for introductory students

Implementation: AI responses were generated using a Zero Shot approach to prompt ChatGPT with physics problems.

Outcomes: AI solutions exhibited structured reasoning and identified forces acting on riders in the Gravitron problem.

Challenges: AI responses sometimes provided incorrect conclusions and lacked the ability to notice knowledge gaps.

Implementation Barriers

Cognitive Limitations

AI lacks the ability to notice gaps in its knowledge system and cannot engage in metacognitive reflection.

Proposed Solutions: Encourage students to critique AI-generated responses and enhance their understanding of physics concepts.

Representation Challenges

AI struggles to generate sophisticated diagrams and representations which are crucial for physics problem solving.

Proposed Solutions: Design assessments that encourage students to create diagrams and use visual aids to support their reasoning.

Project Team

Amogh Sirnoorkar

Researcher

Dean Zollman

Researcher

James T. Laverty

Researcher

Alejandra J. Magana

Researcher

Sanjay Rebello

Researcher

Lynn A. Bryan

Researcher

Contact Information

For information about the paper, please contact the authors.

Authors: Amogh Sirnoorkar, Dean Zollman, James T. Laverty, Alejandra J. Magana, Sanjay Rebello, Lynn A. Bryan

Source Publication: View Original PaperLink opens in a new window

Project Contact: Dr. Jianhua Yang

LLM Model Version: gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

Analysis Provider: Openai

Let us know you agree to cookies