Mixed methods evaluation of two implementation strategies for the BeST intervention
1: To determine the comparative effectiveness of an online training implementation strategy compared to a traditional face-to-face implementation strategy among physiotherapists for the complex intervention, BeST.
2: To explore the acceptability of training physiotherapists to deliver the BeST intervention with the online programme i-BeST.
The objectives of the study were:
- To identify and use a range of outcome measures suitable for evaluating the comparative effectiveness of i-BeST as a training resource for physiotherapists.
- To establish the interest in and uptake of the training interventions from an identified population (physiotherapists in the NHS); determine compliance with both training modalities and participant dropout rate.
- To determine satisfaction with either method of training.
- To evaluate the number of participants implementing the BeST intervention from each implementation strategy.
- To explore participants’ experiences with the online training programme i-BeST.
- To understand participants’ thoughts on receiving training in the BeST intervention with this online modality.
- To learn how i-BeST could be improved for potential future iterations.
Flow diagram of participants through the study
Both the quantitative RCT and qualitative interview study have been completed and the data is currently being analysed.