WEBVTT

c8112b2f-b570-4781-997d-35b917325e9b-0
00:00:05.680 --> 00:00:06.680
Hi I'm Richard.

6e973a03-a352-455e-9ec6-bd37cc6c8354-0
00:00:06.680 --> 00:00:10.320
We're looking at TMUA 2021 paper two,
question 11.

b7b41ec6-9299-4622-bf3e-6cd9c9926eee-0
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:11.480
Let's read it through.

b4681896-9eb1-403e-aec9-bb48f603b2fe-0
00:00:11.480 --> 00:00:15.665
So it says a student attempts to solve
the following problem where A&amp;

b4681896-9eb1-403e-aec9-bb48f603b2fe-1
00:00:15.665 --> 00:00:17.080
B are non 0 real numbers.

8b30a87d-bb01-4772-8c18-5ca5c8b92462-0
00:00:17.400 --> 00:00:22.902
We have show that if a ^2 -,
4 B cubed is greater than or equal to 0

8b30a87d-bb01-4772-8c18-5ca5c8b92462-1
00:00:22.902 --> 00:00:28.962
then there exists real numbers X&amp;
Y such that a is XY times X + y and B

8b30a87d-bb01-4772-8c18-5ca5c8b92462-2
00:00:28.962 --> 00:00:29.760
equals XY.

ce9a2dfe-7d95-4745-883b-8c932fcf85a5-0
00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:31.960
And here we have the students attempt.

51e6d305-19a3-4d25-b958-9dbd9a50c94c-0
00:00:32.400 --> 00:00:36.824
We have to pick out the best description
of the attempt from the six options A to

51e6d305-19a3-4d25-b958-9dbd9a50c94c-1
00:00:36.824 --> 00:00:38.120
F over on the left here.

064530cc-17cf-4da1-b9f5-ee78e13169be-0
00:00:38.440 --> 00:00:40.160
So let's just read through the attempt.

8ef3cf7b-ce55-42c5-ba22-6e77825125d8-0
00:00:41.160 --> 00:00:43.542
So we start with this line which says
that X -,

8ef3cf7b-ce55-42c5-ba22-6e77825125d8-1
00:00:43.542 --> 00:00:45.280
y ^2 is greater than or equal to 0.

a345a4d4-2b62-4cd0-80fa-159022368074-0
00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:48.360
So we can certainly say that will be true
for any two real numbers.

9f55f080-70bd-4e01-bd8d-f7f913b44223-0
00:00:48.360 --> 00:00:49.080
X&amp;Y.

797ce4c2-b812-4dd0-95cf-641c6929f124-0
00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:53.658
We're squaring a real number and that
will give us a number greater than or

797ce4c2-b812-4dd0-95cf-641c6929f124-1
00:00:53.658 --> 00:00:54.200
equal to 0.

5c81458c-ee03-4e47-aea1-34ee57ac092c-0
00:00:55.080 --> 00:00:57.920
The next line is just expanding the left
hand side.

59ab280e-f01d-4eae-8c6e-ff5f8e42a985-0
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:00.440
So because this line is true,
it will follow.

a4b31e58-0516-4dd1-b69c-355a4b583c05-0
00:01:00.440 --> 00:01:04.720
This line will follow because it's just
expanding that bracket X -, y ^2.

5215bacd-b6a5-4952-8582-4b2a85758d24-0
00:01:06.160 --> 00:01:12.768
In the next line,
we have replaced X ^2 + y ^2 - 2 XY with

5215bacd-b6a5-4952-8582-4b2a85758d24-1
00:01:12.768 --> 00:01:14.560
X + y ^2 - 4 XY.

382f6c99-6341-43c1-97cd-91186315d079-0
00:01:14.560 --> 00:01:19.257
Now this is perfectly fine because if we
you can see if we were to expand this,

382f6c99-6341-43c1-97cd-91186315d079-1
00:01:19.257 --> 00:01:23.191
we would have X ^2 + y ^2 + 2 XY and then
subtracting the four XY,

382f6c99-6341-43c1-97cd-91186315d079-2
00:01:23.191 --> 00:01:26.480
we would be left with what we had on the
previous line.

7ad81ec9-21a0-42a8-8575-3287afa4d654-0
00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:31.936
So all we've done here is we've replaced
this expression with an identical

7ad81ec9-21a0-42a8-8575-3287afa4d654-1
00:01:31.936 --> 00:01:35.622
expression,
an expression which is identically equal

7ad81ec9-21a0-42a8-8575-3287afa4d654-2
00:01:35.622 --> 00:01:36.040
to it.

16079e7e-5cf4-469d-8407-ef87f1d4f0fa-0
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:38.160
So this is fine as a deduction.

48bf959c-197e-47ed-a4c7-4a86b40b7da2-0
00:01:38.880 --> 00:01:43.465
In the next line,
we seem to have multiplied both sides by

48bf959c-197e-47ed-a4c7-4a86b40b7da2-1
00:01:43.465 --> 00:01:44.320
X ^2, y ^2.

7ec3e5e3-cf51-4cf5-83fa-c22862ec8801-0
00:01:45.080 --> 00:01:48.311
Now we know that X ^2,
y ^2 is going to be greater than or equal

7ec3e5e3-cf51-4cf5-83fa-c22862ec8801-1
00:01:48.311 --> 00:01:48.560
to 0.

67ad610b-713f-4763-b060-9c5a83517f28-0
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:52.000
It's the product of 2 squares and so that
line will be fine as well.

30b384b2-4c33-4d94-838d-4f2f7cea91c9-0
00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:54.981
We're taking an inequality when
multiplying both sides by value,

30b384b2-4c33-4d94-838d-4f2f7cea91c9-1
00:01:54.981 --> 00:01:57.045
which we know is greater than or equal to
0,

30b384b2-4c33-4d94-838d-4f2f7cea91c9-2
00:01:57.045 --> 00:01:58.880
so this will follow from the line above.

dd61d2f0-8e13-4ef4-94bf-0347e65ac5c1-0
00:02:00.080 --> 00:02:05.610
Now in the next line,
we seem to have replaced X ^2 y ^2 * X +

dd61d2f0-8e13-4ef4-94bf-0347e65ac5c1-1
00:02:05.610 --> 00:02:09.560
y ^2 with a ^2 and also X ^3 y ^3 with b
^3.

a441ca5a-797f-40ff-9483-96f348ba6d9c-0
00:02:09.960 --> 00:02:17.596
So in this line we are assuming that a is
equal to XY times X + y and B is equal to

a441ca5a-797f-40ff-9483-96f348ba6d9c-1
00:02:17.596 --> 00:02:19.960
X * y in order to do that.

d50f2852-81c8-43a9-ad19-ba9f0892aaf6-0
00:02:21.200 --> 00:02:23.640
And if that were true,
then this would follow.

053e7c96-0c2d-4d6f-a8d6-eb6617a41c86-0
00:02:24.280 --> 00:02:28.520
So what's actually happened in this line
is we have assumed that what we need.

dfa9bf6f-0dfa-4183-8465-46302916c912-0
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:34.040
We have assumed that a is XY times X + y
and that B is X * y.

d32d49d3-9557-44f4-85bf-6b4a42822abe-0
00:02:34.880 --> 00:02:40.800
So what we're looking at here is a proof
that if A&amp;B do satisfy this,

d32d49d3-9557-44f4-85bf-6b4a42822abe-1
00:02:40.800 --> 00:02:45.040
then a ^2 -,
4 B cubed will be greater than or equal

d32d49d3-9557-44f4-85bf-6b4a42822abe-2
00:02:45.040 --> 00:02:45.440
to 0.

938b0e00-baa1-4b89-9eab-923e06983c97-0
00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:50.160
Now this is exactly the opposite of what
the student has been asked to prove.

8a42eb02-8780-4be3-b6a4-dc0e85906f1a-0
00:02:50.160 --> 00:02:53.293
The student has been asked to prove that
if a ^2 -,

8a42eb02-8780-4be3-b6a4-dc0e85906f1a-1
00:02:53.293 --> 00:02:57.932
4 B cubed is greater than or equal to 0,
then there will be solutions X&amp;

8a42eb02-8780-4be3-b6a4-dc0e85906f1a-2
00:02:57.932 --> 00:02:59.680
Y to these two relationships.

fe0d5f17-8616-4837-a0c9-50292a0dffec-0
00:03:00.720 --> 00:03:05.458
So since the student has assumed that
these solutions exist and and has a valid

fe0d5f17-8616-4837-a0c9-50292a0dffec-1
00:03:05.458 --> 00:03:08.834
argument that H ^2 - 4 BQ is greater than
or equal to 0,

fe0d5f17-8616-4837-a0c9-50292a0dffec-2
00:03:08.834 --> 00:03:11.440
they have proved what we call the
converse.

d0a52716-bd90-4471-b584-e452d8ecd0d6-0
00:03:11.920 --> 00:03:16.640
So to emphasise what that means is in our
question the state.

c379defb-f8a9-4d0b-acde-94abf7c4942f-0
00:03:16.640 --> 00:03:21.000
The student has been asked to show that a
statement P implies a statement Q.

cf3caf27-c0c6-4d94-a709-cf54f50ceee2-0
00:03:21.560 --> 00:03:25.816
So P was the a ^2 -, 4,
B cubed is greater or equal to 0,

cf3caf27-c0c6-4d94-a709-cf54f50ceee2-1
00:03:25.816 --> 00:03:30.880
and Q was that there exist X&amp;
Y such that this and this is true.

516fb12e-2a1c-4370-87c1-88a73d175168-0
00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:35.390
The student has actually proved that Q
implies P,

516fb12e-2a1c-4370-87c1-88a73d175168-1
00:03:35.390 --> 00:03:41.000
and so they have proved the converse of
what they were required to prove.

b6902ed9-c6b4-4cb7-89c8-befa693b873c-0
00:03:41.600 --> 00:03:45.620
And so the best description of this
response is that it is incorrect,

b6902ed9-c6b4-4cb7-89c8-befa693b873c-1
00:03:45.620 --> 00:03:49.640
but that the student has proved the
converse, which is option C here.