Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Student feedback sheet

STUDENT FEEDBACK

All marks are recommendations only and are subject to approval by the Board of Examiners, having been processed by the Department's Academic Quality Procedure.

Surname

 

First name(s)

 

Student Number

 

Project Title

 

Degree

 

Supervisor

 

2nd Assessor

 


Assessment Status (Please Tick)

Assessment Completed

 

No assessment possible at this time. Referred for investigation for plagiarism.

The concerns are indicated in the comments below; if you have any explanation, please return to the course office, in writing within 7 days

 


Performance at Oral (tick as necessary)

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Comment

Demonstration that written work is that of the candidate

 

 

 

Ability to communicate effectively and answer questions

 

 

 

See attached the Mark Criteria grid for an explanation of the following matrix

Criteria

80+

70-79

60–69

50-59

40-49

30-39

20-29

<20

Formulate a research question suitable for the degree and consistent with the time and resource available to conduct the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Critically evaluate the corpus of research, synthesising relevant ideas into a referenced literature review.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Select and apply appropriate research methods to suit the requirements of a specific research question.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Devise and perform an investigation, informed by the findings of previous researchers and efficiently utilising available resource.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conduct research in an ethically responsible manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present findings with clarity, appropriately evaluating the confidence that should be placed in any findings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrate authoritative intellectual ownership of findings presented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan and monitor an extended piece of research, reporting progress to interested parties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manage project risk appropriately, applying suitable mitigations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

>70%

69-60%

59-50%

49-40%

<40%

Recommended Dissertation Mark Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional comments by Assessors, in particular indicating areas of particular strength and weaknesses.