Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Smithian Growth Through Creative Organisation

Smithian Growth Through Creative Organisation

77/2012 Patrick Legros, Andrew F. Newman and Eugenio Proto
behavioural economics and wellbeing, working papers
The Review of Economics and Statistics
https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00421

77/2012 Patrick Legros, Andrew F. Newman and Eugenio Proto

We consider a model in which appropriate organization fosters innovation, but because of contractibility problems, this benefit cannot be internalized. The organizational design element we focus on is the division of labor, which as Adam Smith argued, facilitates invention by observers of the production process. However, entrepreneurs choose its level only to facilitate monitoring their workers. Whether there is innovation depends on the interaction of the markets for labour and for inventions. A high level of specialization is chosen when the wage share is low. But low wage shares arise only when there are few entrepreneurs, which limits the market for innovations therefore and discourages inventive activity. When there are many entrepreneurs, the innovation market is large, but the rate of invention is low because there is little specialization. Rapid technological progress therefore requires a balance between these opposing effects, which occurs with a moderate relative scarcity of entrepreneurs and workers. In a dynamic version of the model in which a credit constraint limits entry into entrepreneurship, this relative scarcity depends on the wealth distribution, which evolves endogenously. There is an inverted-U relation between growth rates driven by innovation and the level of inequality. Institutional improvements have ambiguous effects on growth. In light of the model, we offer a reassessment of the mechanism by which organizational innovations such as the factory may have spawned the industrial revolution.

Behavioural Economics and Wellbeing

The Review of Economics and Statistics

https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00421