Skip to main content Skip to navigation

The Columbian Exchange and conflict in Asia

The Columbian Exchange and conflict in Asia

527/2020 Mark Dincecco, James Fenske and Anil Menon
economic history, working papers

527/2020 Mark Dincecco, James Fenske and Anil Menon

Difference in difference and event study analyses in a panel of Asian grid cells over nine centuries demonstrate that greater agricultural potential due to New World crops increased violent conflict after 1500. Rising caloric potential in a typical grid cell increased conflict by roughly its mean. The result holds across several New World crops and conflict types. It is largely driven by South Asia, a densely populated, diverse region with several competing historical states. The evidence supports a rapacity effect – increases in the gains from appropriation to Asian and non-Asian belligerents – as a mechanism. Population density, urbanization, and British imperialism significantly mediate the impact of the Columbian Exchange.

Economic History