<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static_war/render/xsl/rss2.xsl" media="screen" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>WMS &#187; Space for Thought Forum</title>
    <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/news/events/sft/spaceforthoughtforum/</link>
    <description>The latest posts to WMS &#187; Space for Thought Forum</description>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <copyright>(C) 2026 University of Warwick</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:06:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>SiteBuilder2, University of Warwick, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Health and the environment: how do we convince cash strapped governments?</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/news/events/sft/spaceforthoughtforum/?post=094d43d54421a19801444fcc0eb31b88</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many of us are aware of the burgeoning evidence regrading the importance the built environment plays in health and wellbeing... But it does not rank high on government agendas for investment value. How can we convince governments and funding agenicies otherwise, is return on investment analysis the only way... or is the potential impact on population health and wellbeing enough? See this discussion of interest...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://theconversation.com/our-cities-need-more-trees-and-water-not-less-to-stay-liveable-22166" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://theconversation.com/our-cities-need-more-trees-and-water-not-less-to-stay-liveable-22166&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>A guest user</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">094d43d54421a19801444fcc0eb31b88</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
