<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static_war/render/xsl/rss2.xsl" media="screen" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Criminal Justice Centre &#187; News (tag [Comparative research])</title>
    <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/</link>
    <description>The latest from Criminal Justice Centre &#187; News (tag [Comparative research])</description>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <copyright>(C) 2026 University of Warwick</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:21:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>SiteBuilder2, University of Warwick, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder</generator>
    <category>Alice Gerlach</category>
    <category>Ana Aliverti</category>
    <category>Anastasia Chamberlen</category>
    <category>, and International Criminal Law</category>
    <category>Azrini Wahidin</category>
    <category>blog</category>
    <category>border</category>
    <category>Brexit</category>
    <category>British Academy</category>
    <category>British Science Association</category>
    <category>British Society of Criminology</category>
    <category>BSC Book Award</category>
    <category>call for papers</category>
    <category>Charles Adeogun-Phillips</category>
    <category>CJC</category>
    <category>CJC Events</category>
    <category>Comparative Criminal Procedure</category>
    <category>Comparative research</category>
    <category>Conference</category>
    <category>Conflict</category>
    <category>COPR</category>
    <category>courts</category>
    <category>Criminal Cases Review Commission</category>
    <category>Criminal Justice</category>
    <category>Criminal Justice Centre</category>
    <category>criminal law</category>
    <category>Criminal Procedure</category>
    <category>Criminology</category>
    <category>Critical Criminology</category>
    <category>Divya Sukumar</category>
    <category>Empirical research</category>
    <category>ESC Young Criminologist Award</category>
    <category>European Arrest Warrants</category>
    <category>European Criminal Procedure</category>
    <category>European Society of Criminology</category>
    <category>European Union</category>
    <category>Exhibition</category>
    <category>Fair Trials</category>
    <category>Fallout</category>
    <category>Fellow</category>
    <category>Fellowship</category>
    <category>film</category>
    <category>foreign nationals</category>
    <category>Funding</category>
    <category>Future of CJ systems</category>
    <category>Global South</category>
    <category>Grace (Yu) Mou</category>
    <category>harm</category>
    <category>Henrique Carvalho</category>
    <category>Human Rights</category>
    <category>ICTR</category>
    <category>imagery</category>
    <category>international crimes</category>
    <category>International criminal law</category>
    <category>Ioana Vr&#259;biescu</category>
    <category>Jackie Hodgson</category>
    <category>Jacqueline Hodgson</category>
    <category>Job opportunity</category>
    <category>journal</category>
    <category>Juliet Horne</category>
    <category>JUSTICE</category>
    <category>juvenile</category>
    <category>keynote</category>
    <category>Kimberley Wade</category>
    <category>Laura Lammasniemi</category>
    <category>Laur&#232;ne Soubise</category>
    <category>Law and Human Behavior</category>
    <category>Law &amp; Human Behavior</category>
    <category>Law &amp; Psychology</category>
    <category>Leverhulme Grant</category>
    <category>LWOP</category>
    <category>miscarriage of justice</category>
    <category>Modern Records Centre</category>
    <category>Natalie Kyneswood</category>
    <category>new book</category>
    <category>Open Society Foundations</category>
    <category>Penal Populism</category>
    <category>Philip Leverhulme Prize</category>
    <category>Poland</category>
    <category>Post Doctoral Fellowship</category>
    <category>Power</category>
    <category>Prison</category>
    <category>prison conditions</category>
    <category>Prisons</category>
    <category>Publication</category>
    <category>Public engagement</category>
    <category>Punishment</category>
    <category>racism</category>
    <category>SLSA Article Prize</category>
    <category>Soros Justice Fellowships</category>
    <category>Theoretical Criminology</category>
    <category>Theoretical Research</category>
    <category>The Prison Journal</category>
    <category>The Ulam Programme</category>
    <category>University of Wroclaw</category>
    <category>Victor Tadros</category>
    <category>Visitors</category>
    <category>Women's Equality Party</category>
    <category>Workshop</category>
    <category>Untagged</category>
    <item>
      <title>'The McDonaldization of justice and the disappearance of fair trial?' Conference 19- 21 May 2022</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a17841b7ef833cf017f0c598c752d67</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Flaw%2Fresearch%2Fcentres%2Fcjc%2Fnews&amp;newsItem=8a17841b7ef833cf017f0c598c752d67" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;From 19 - 21 May 2022 the 11th conference in the series The Future of Adversarial and Inquisitorial System, a collaboration between the Universities of Warwick, North Carolina, Bologna, Basel and Duke University will be hosted at Scarman House, University of Warwick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The conference draws upon what Ritzer has described as a kind of McDonaldization of criminal justice. As the trial becomes increasingly rare, along with opportunities to challenge the reliability of evidence, the accused finds herself encouraged to make an admission at the earliest opportunity based on the information gathered during the police investigation. The presence of defence counsel at strategic points in the process lends some legitimacy, but the practices of law reflect little of the safeguards and values so celebrated in the rhetoric of both adversarial and inquisitorial-type systems. Processes are being &#8216;simplified&#8217; &amp;ndash; not in ways that make the process clear and easy to navigate &amp;ndash; but through the removal of fundamental safeguards deemed too costly and time-consuming such as juries, judicial investigation, or any form of trial or contestation of charges. Added to this are new types of evidence, gathered in as yet unregulated ways, the nature and provenance of which require careful scrutiny if they are to form the basis of prosecution and conviction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several conference panels will be devoted to discussion of these themes drawing on Hodgson&#8217;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-metamorphosis-of-criminal-justice-9780199981427?q=hodgson&amp;amp;cc=gb&amp;amp;lang=en"&gt;The Metamorphosis of Criminal Justice&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(2020, OUP). In this work, through a comparative analysis of the potentially radical and fundamental changes taking place across two contrasting jurisdictions (England and Wales, and France), she explores the ways that criminal justice traditions continue to be shaped in different ways by broader policy and political concerns, and the ways in which different systems adapt, change and distort when faced with (sometimes conflicting) pressures domestically and externally. This comparative lens also illuminates the ways that, in England and Wales and in France, different procedural values may serve to structure or limit reform, and so work to facilitate or resist change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thursday 19th May is devoted to presentations from Early Career Researchers. &lt;a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/events/the_mcdonaldisation_of/early_careers_research_conference_final.pdf"&gt;View the programme&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Attendance is free, but participants &lt;a href="mailto:law.events@warwick.ac.uk"&gt;must register via email&lt;/a&gt; first to secure a place.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main conference takes place on Friday 20th and the morning of Saturday 21st May. &lt;a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/events/the_mcdonaldisation_of/may_2022_conference_programme_revised_06_may.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;View the programme&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;All are welcome but you &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:law.events@warwick.ac.uk"&gt;must register via email&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt; and there is a small charge for attendance (&#163;35 Friday, including lunch; &#163;25 Saturday). You are also welcome to join the conference dinner on the evening of Friday 20th May at a cost of &#163;35.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More details including conference programmes and registration details can be found &lt;a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/events/the_mcdonaldisation_of/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>CJC Events</category>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Conference</category>
      <category>Criminal Justice</category>
      <category>Criminal Justice Centre</category>
      <category>Fair Trials</category>
      <category>Future of CJ systems</category>
      <category>Jackie Hodgson</category>
      <category>Jacqueline Hodgson</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841b7ef833cf017f0c598c752d67</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jackie Hodgson to speak at Cardiff Law School's workshop</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571287</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Jackie Hodgson will give a paper at a workshop jointly organised by the Cardiff Centre for Crime, Law and Justice and the Cardiff Centre of Law and Society. The workshop on 'Best practice in security and justice: from cross-cultural description and explanation to transnational prescription?&amp;rsquo; will take place on 15-16 May 2017.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To seek to further our understanding of the challenges of learning cross-culturally in relation to security and justice by examining whether - and if so how - one can usefully and validly define transnational &amp;lsquo;good practice.&amp;rsquo; The workshop aims to draw on the experiences of eminent cross-cultural researchers in a range of areas such as youth justice, defence rights and lawyering, urban security, policing and crime prevention more broadly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jackie will present a paper on 'People or Procedures? Securing effective defence rights across legal cultures', building on research conducted on defence lawyers and the challenges of moving towards universal standards in relation to the scope, nature and quality of custodial legal assistance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Further detail is available on Cardiff University's website: &lt;a href="http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/events/view/best-practice-in-security-and-justice-from-cross-cultural-description-and-explanation-to-transnational-prescription/"&gt;http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/events/view/best-practice-in-security-and-justice-from-cross-cultural-description-and-explanation-to-transnational-prescription/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 14:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571287</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call for proposals - Improving Police/Public Relations and Police Diversity</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571286</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Open Society Initiative for Europe has published a call for proposals on Improving Police/Public Relations and Police Diversity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The call for proposals is available &lt;a id="link533895" href="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/copr/improving-police-public-relations-20170424_latest_en.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and more details on their &lt;a href="https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/grants/improving-policepublic-relations-and-police-diversity-20170421" target="_blank"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>COPR</category>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Public engagement</category>
      <category>Theoretical Research</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 08:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571286</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Book! Access to Justice and Legal Aid</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571285</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Flaw%2Fresearch%2Fcentres%2Fcjc%2Fnews&amp;newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571285" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prof Jackie Hodgson and Asher Flynn from Monash have a new edited collection on '&lt;em&gt;Access to Justice and Legal Aid: Comparative Perspectives on Unmet Legal Need&lt;/em&gt;' published by Hart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This book considers how access to justice is affected by restrictions to legal aid budgets and increasingly prescriptive service guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As common law jurisdictions, England and Wales, and Australia, share similar ideals, policies and practices, but they differ in aspects of their legal and political culture, in the nature of the communities they serve and in their approaches to providing access to justice. These jurisdictions thus provide us with different perspectives on what constitutes justice and how we might seek to overcome the burgeoning crisis in unmet legal need.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The book fills an important gap in existing scholarship as the first to bring together new empirical and theoretical knowledge examining different responses to legal aid crises both in the domestic and comparative contexts, across criminal, civil and family law. It achieves this by examining the broader social, political, legal, health and welfare impacts of legal aid cuts and prescriptive service guidelines. Across both jurisdictions, this work suggests that it is the most vulnerable groups who lose out in the way that law is now done in the 21st century.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The book is essential reading for all those interested in access to justice and legal aid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <category>Theoretical Research</category>
      <category>Visitors</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571285</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Research Workshop at National Law University Delhi</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571284</link>
      <description>&lt;div style="margin: 0;"&gt;Alan Norrie and Henrique Carvalho designed and offered a very successful two day research workshop on Critical Theory and Criminal Justice in New Delhi, India. The workshop from 6-7 April was in collaboration with the National Law University, Delhi and was supported by Craig Reeves of Birkbeck Law School. The workshop was attended by about 50 persons and included 20 presentations over two days. Sessions were held on: critical realism, critique and criminal justice; violence, gender and sexuality; penality, psychoanalysis and the death penalty; state repression, terrorism and torture; criminal justice ethics, emancipation and love; and the possibilities of legal dialogue. The workshop allowed British and Indian colleagues to share experiences of different criminal justice systems, and to engage in a theoretical dialogue about the nature and claims of a critical theoretical approach to the law. It was greatly appreciated by the participants, and discussions are ongoing as to how to take things forward. &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="margin: 0;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="margin: 0;"&gt;After the workshop, Alan Norrie delivered a filmed lecture in the School of Gender and Development Studies at Indira Gandhi National Open University entitled &amp;lsquo;Love and Justice: Can We Flourish Without Addressing the Past?&amp;rsquo;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Theoretical Research</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 07:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571284</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jackie Hodgson to give a talk at Edinburgh University</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571280</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;CJC Director Jackie Hodgson will give a talk on 'Protecting Suspects in Europe: Towards Universal Norms' at the Edinburgh Centre for Legal Theory on 22 March. Details of the talk can be found here: &lt;a href="http://www.centreforlegaltheory.ed.ac.uk/events/events/edinburgh_centre_for_legal_theory/tbc_-_prof._jackie_hodgson_university_of_warwick"&gt;http://www.centreforlegaltheory.ed.ac.uk/events/events/edinburgh_centre_for_legal_theory/tbc_-_prof._jackie_hodgson_university_of_warwick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This paper discusses domestic and European legal frameworks governing custodial legal advice and the challenges in ensuring that legal assistance for suspects held in police custody across different jurisdictions is effective in practice. Beginning with an appreciation of the significance of police detention and interrogation for the investigation, prosecution and disposition of criminal cases, the paper goes on to analyse the features of criminal justice present across a variety of procedural models, which either promote or prevent legal assistance as a due process right. The paper draws on recent comparative empirical research that includes France, England and Wales, Scotland and the Netherlands, as well as Jackie's earlier work on defence lawyers in England and Wales and in France.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571280</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ninth Conference on the Future of Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc157127f</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Jackie Hodgson, CJC Director, and CJC members Divya Sukumar and Sharda Ramdewor will take part in the Ninth Conference on the Future of Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems. The theme of this year's conference is: 'Rights and Remedies in Criminal Procedure: Examining the Nature of the Relationship'. The Conference cycle on the Future of Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems is a collaboration between the University of Warwick (UK), the University of North Carolina (USA), the University of Bologna-Ravenna (Italy) and the University of Basel (Switzerland).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sharda and Divya will both present their research during the pre-conference for young scholars. Sharda will talk about 'Using Body Worn Video as evidence to combat disproportionate stop and searches/frisks' and Divya will present a paper entitled ' Strategic Disclosure of Evidence in Police Interviews: Implications for Suspects and their Lawyers'.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jackie will act as a moderator for the pre-conference for young scholars and take part in the main conference. She will sit on a panel on 'Comparative Approaches to Rights and Remedies in a Time of Austerity'. In this panel, the different approaches of adversarial and inquisitorial procedural traditions to the guaranteeing of rights, and how the rise of managerialism and reduced budgets has impacted these guarantees in theory and in practice will be considered. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A. Rights are protected in different ways. In a party-based adversarial procedural model, (positive) fair trial rights are an integral part of equality of arms for the defense. Inquisitorially rooted models have relied historically on the more neutral ideology of judicial officers responsible for investigation and prosecution, and this has created tensions with the recent strengthening of positive rights through EU directives (such as those implementing the so-called roadmap) and ECtHR decisions such as Salduz v Turkey. Some jurisdictions, such as France, regard the imposition of the right to counsel at the first stages of the investigation as rooted in the Anglo-Saxon tradition and so inappropriate for French criminal justice. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;B. The constant push for cheaper and speedier processes of criminal justice undercuts the protection of rights in both procedural models &amp;ndash; from the resourcing of legal aid; to the time available to prepare the defense; to the ability of public prosecutors to oversee case preparation and the disposal of cases through alternatives to trial.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>CJC Events</category>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Future of CJ systems</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc157127f</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publication on Criminal Justice Adjudication and Mass Migration</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc157127d</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Flaw%2Fresearch%2Fcentres%2Fcjc%2Fnews&amp;newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc157127d" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ana Aliverti has edited a &lt;a href="http://nclr.ucpress.edu/content/20/1" target="_blank"&gt;special issue&lt;/a&gt; for the &lt;em&gt;New Criminal Law Review&lt;/em&gt; on 'Criminal Justice Adjudication in an Age of Migration'.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The articles are united by a shared set of questions about the salience of citizenship in contemporary criminal justice policies and practices. As such, they offer important empirical and theoretical evidence of the shifting global terrain. In particular, the articles in this collection address three distinct, yet interconnected, matters: migration control and state sovereignty, fairness and equality, and politics and policy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ana is presenting the articles in more details in a &lt;a href="https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2017/01/new-publication" target="_blank"&gt;blog post for Border Criminologies&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc157127d</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publication! Access to Justice and Legal Aid</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571278</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Prof Jackie Hodgson and Asher Flynn from Monash have a new edited collection on '&lt;em&gt;Access to Justice and Legal Aid: Comparative Perspectives on Unmet Legal Need&lt;/em&gt;' published by Hart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This book considers how access to justice is affected by restrictions to legal aid budgets and increasingly prescriptive service guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As common law jurisdictions, England and Wales, and Australia, share similar ideals, policies and practices, but they differ in aspects of their legal and political culture, in the nature of the communities they serve and in their approaches to providing access to justice. These jurisdictions thus provide us with different perspectives on what constitutes justice and how we might seek to overcome the burgeoning crisis in unmet legal need.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The book fills an important gap in existing scholarship as the first to bring together new empirical and theoretical knowledge examining different responses to legal aid crises both in the domestic and comparative contexts, across criminal, civil and family law. It achieves this by examining the broader social, political, legal, health and welfare impacts of legal aid cuts and prescriptive service guidelines. Across both jurisdictions, this work suggests that it is the most vulnerable groups who lose out in the way that law is now done in the 21st century.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The book is essential reading for all those interested in access to justice and legal aid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <category>Theoretical Research</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571278</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publication! Prosecution in France</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/centres/cjc/news/?newsItem=8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571276</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Prof Jackie Hodgson &amp;amp; Laur&amp;egrave;ne Soubise have published an article on 'Prosecution in France' in &lt;em&gt;Oxford Handbooks Online&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Their essay examines the increasingly ambivalent role and status of the French prosecutor, the &lt;i&gt;procureur&lt;/i&gt;. As a judicial officer (&lt;i&gt;magistrat&lt;/i&gt;), she is required to act in and to uphold the public interest, but her hierarchical accountability to the executive and her role in the formation and implementation of local criminal justice policy threaten her independence, notably in the eyes of her fellow &lt;i&gt;magistrats&lt;/i&gt;. The dominance of the executive, both politically and through the imposition of managerialist imperatives, is felt in the ever-expanding role of the &lt;i&gt;procureur&lt;/i&gt;, especially in the local sphere. While the limited forms of legal and structural accountability in place leave the prosecutor with broad discretion, this is diminished through the drive to standardization resulting from the delegation of work to fulfill the demands of dealing with greater numbers of cases more quickly, with fewer resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Comparative research</category>
      <category>Empirical research</category>
      <category>Future of CJ systems</category>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:51:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d8697d2eb3016980bfc1571276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
