<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static_war/render/xsl/rss2.xsl" media="screen" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rethinking the Market &#187; Activities and Outputs (tag [blog post])</title>
    <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/</link>
    <description>The latest from Rethinking the Market &#187; Activities and Outputs (tag [blog post])</description>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <copyright>(C) 2026 University of Warwick</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 22:12:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>SiteBuilder2, University of Warwick, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder</generator>
    <category>Adam Smith</category>
    <category>Agenda</category>
    <category>asset management industry</category>
    <category>Balsillie School of International Affairs</category>
    <category>Baltimore</category>
    <category>BBC</category>
    <category>Belgrade Theatre</category>
    <category>Benjamin M, Friedman</category>
    <category>Birmingham</category>
    <category>Black History Month</category>
    <category>BlackRock</category>
    <category>blog post</category>
    <category>book</category>
    <category>book chapter</category>
    <category>book launch</category>
    <category>book review</category>
    <category>book talk</category>
    <category>Brexit</category>
    <category>Bristol</category>
    <category>Britain Alone</category>
    <category>British Journal of Sociology</category>
    <category>British Museum</category>
    <category>British Politics</category>
    <category>Cambridge</category>
    <category>careers talk</category>
    <category>China Plate</category>
    <category>Civil Service Fast Stream</category>
    <category>Colombo Telegraph</category>
    <category>Colonial Hangover</category>
    <category>Columbia University Press</category>
    <category>Competition and Change</category>
    <category>competition law</category>
    <category>Conservative Party</category>
    <category>conspicuous consumption</category>
    <category>Copenhagen</category>
    <category>Copenhagen Business School</category>
    <category>Coventry</category>
    <category>Covid crisis</category>
    <category>crisis</category>
    <category>Critical Political Economy Research Network</category>
    <category>Daily Telegraph</category>
    <category>Daniela Tepe</category>
    <category>Dark Luxury</category>
    <category>David Edgar</category>
    <category>David Ricardo</category>
    <category>decolonisation</category>
    <category>discussant</category>
    <category>Donald Trump</category>
    <category>DSGE models</category>
    <category>Dublin</category>
    <category>Eastbourne</category>
    <category>economic modelling</category>
    <category>Economic Record</category>
    <category>economic theory</category>
    <category>Economy and Society</category>
    <category>edited collection</category>
    <category>eighteenth century</category>
    <category>Empire</category>
    <category>epistemic injustice</category>
    <category>European Sociological Association</category>
    <category>Exploring Economics</category>
    <category>Faculti</category>
    <category>False Prophets of Economics Imperialism</category>
    <category>financialisation</category>
    <category>Financial Times</category>
    <category>Firesouls</category>
    <category>fiscal black hole</category>
    <category>Fools' Gold</category>
    <category>free market models</category>
    <category>From Values to Virtues</category>
    <category>Glasgow</category>
    <category>global financial crisis</category>
    <category>Harriet Martineau</category>
    <category>Hendon</category>
    <category>Historical Association</category>
    <category>history curriculum</category>
    <category>history of economic thought</category>
    <category>In Our Time</category>
    <category>Institute of Art and Ideas</category>
    <category>International Karl Polanyi Society</category>
    <category>James Clerk Maxwell</category>
    <category>Jeremy Hunt</category>
    <category>Joseph-Louis Lagrange</category>
    <category>journal article</category>
    <category>Karl Polanyi</category>
    <category>keynote address</category>
    <category>King Edward VI College</category>
    <category>King's College London</category>
    <category>Labour Party</category>
    <category>Leeds</category>
    <category>letter to newspaper</category>
    <category>Liam Stanley</category>
    <category>Liverpool</category>
    <category>Llandudno</category>
    <category>Lloyds Bank</category>
    <category>lockdown</category>
    <category>London</category>
    <category>London Review of Education</category>
    <category>LSE</category>
    <category>Lyng Hall</category>
    <category>macroeconomic models</category>
    <category>magazine article</category>
    <category>Mais Lecture</category>
    <category>Malmo</category>
    <category>Manchester</category>
    <category>Manchester University Press</category>
    <category>Mark Pennington</category>
    <category>masterclass</category>
    <category>mathematisation of the market model</category>
    <category>Mela</category>
    <category>Melvyn Bragg</category>
    <category>Michael Gove</category>
    <category>Naked Capitalism</category>
    <category>neoliberalism</category>
    <category>Newcastle</category>
    <category>New Political Economy</category>
    <category>Nuneaton</category>
    <category>online feature</category>
    <category>OUP</category>
    <category>outreach</category>
    <category>Oxford</category>
    <category>PAIS</category>
    <category>Palgrave</category>
    <category>paper presentation</category>
    <category>Paris</category>
    <category>pecha kucha</category>
    <category>Peter Kerr</category>
    <category>podcast</category>
    <category>policy briefing paper</category>
    <category>Political Economy for the End Times</category>
    <category>Political Quarterly</category>
    <category>Political Studies Association</category>
    <category>politics and performance</category>
    <category>poster</category>
    <category>public talk</category>
    <category>Queen Mary</category>
    <category>RADA</category>
    <category>recognitional politics</category>
    <category>Review of International Political Economy</category>
    <category>Review of Social Economy</category>
    <category>Rishi Sunak</category>
    <category>robinson crusoe</category>
    <category>roundtable discussion</category>
    <category>Routledge</category>
    <category>school curriculum</category>
    <category>schools day</category>
    <category>scientific unification</category>
    <category>Sheffield</category>
    <category>Sir John Talbot's School</category>
    <category>SOAS</category>
    <category>Social Foundations of Finance</category>
    <category>Sorbonne Nouvelle</category>
    <category>Southampton</category>
    <category>Speri</category>
    <category>Steven Kettell</category>
    <category>summer school</category>
    <category>Sutton Trust</category>
    <category>talk</category>
    <category>tariffs</category>
    <category>Tax Justice Network</category>
    <category>teaching session</category>
    <category>theatre group</category>
    <category>The Baffler</category>
    <category>The Conversation</category>
    <category>The Guardian</category>
    <category>The Hague</category>
    <category>The Market</category>
    <category>Thorstein Veblen</category>
    <category>Tim Sinclair</category>
    <category>tobacco merchants</category>
    <category>Trussonomics</category>
    <category>Trying It On</category>
    <category>Uneconomic Economics</category>
    <category>University of Edinburgh</category>
    <category>University of Sheffield</category>
    <category>University of the Arts London</category>
    <category>University of Warwick</category>
    <category>University of Waterloo</category>
    <category>Vienna</category>
    <category>Warwick</category>
    <category>Warwick Arts Centre</category>
    <category>West Midlands IPE Workshop</category>
    <category>What Went Wrong with Britain</category>
    <category>Whitchurch</category>
    <category>widening participation</category>
    <category>Witten</category>
    <category>working paper</category>
    <category>workshop participation</category>
    <category>Untagged</category>
    <item>
      <title>Institute of Art and Ideas blog post on the philosophical limits of mathematical market models</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8ac672c4928fa80d01929bbceda75543</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8ac672c4928fa80d01929bbceda75543" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;On October 17th 2024, I published an article on the Institute of Art and Ideas blog site called '&lt;a href="https://iai.tv/articles/why-maths-alone-cannot-predict-the-economy-auid-2971?_auid=2020" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Why maths alone cannot predict the economy: Mathematical proof is not economic fact&lt;/a&gt;'.  It provides a brief philosophical account of the main claims of my recent book, &lt;a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a1785d8909c4ddc0190c5dc231d70e3" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;False Prophets of Economics Imperialism&lt;/a&gt;.  The most sophisticated proof-makers in mathematical economics, I argue, were clear right from the outset of their endeavour that they were not talking about the world as it is actually experienced.  They were engaged instead in creating epistemic artefacts that could act as the spur to further thinking, but only on the realisation that the world that appeared in their models was a parallel universe to the world in which everyday life is lived.  In other words, they were conducting thought experiments, primarily about what might go wrong if the market systems represented by series of equations were treated as something more than the mathematical notation of which they are comprised.  Contemporary practices of economics imperialism fall into precisely this trap.  They have to first pretend that complexly layered social situations are really markets at heart, before they can then use their mathematical market models to define the essence of those environments.  As I show, though, there is no philosophical justification for proceeding in such a way.  The whole project of economics imperialism thus falls down.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>mathematisation of the market model</category>
      <category>False Prophets of Economics Imperialism</category>
      <category>Institute of Art and Ideas</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8ac672c4928fa80d01929bbceda75543</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SPERI Comment Blog Post: Conservative Fantasies of 'the Market'</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a17841a6bb243f2016be5fb0c1d6e23</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a17841a6bb243f2016be5fb0c1d6e23" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Philip Hammond has recently made a rather startling confession for a Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer: that 'the market' is currently failing fairness tests in the distributional outcomes it is producing in the UK. However, his solution saw him quickly restored to partisan type, idealising 'textbook' market institutions and setting as the future goal returning to the way market outcomes are 'supposed to' operate. This &lt;a href="http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2019/07/11/conservative-fantasies-of-the-market/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;SPERI Comment blog post &lt;/a&gt;highlights the continued reification of ideal-typical market constructions within Conservative Party political rhetoric. 'The market' is still capable of producing the best possible outcomes, Hammond seemed to be saying, even if the Government of which he was a key member had found it impossible to secure the conditions under which this might be so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Sheffield</category>
      <category>Speri</category>
      <category>Conservative Party</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841a6bb243f2016be5fb0c1d6e23</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LSE Blog Post on Michael Gove's 'History Wars'</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a1785d76b2d9d33016b32dd6fe40e0b</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a1785d76b2d9d33016b32dd6fe40e0b" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;On June 7th 2019 I had a post published on the &lt;a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/michael-goves-war-on-historians/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;LSE's British Politics and Policy blog site&lt;/a&gt;. It is called 'Michael Gove's War on Historians: Extreme Whig History and Conservative Curriculum Reform'. It follows closely the argument in my recently published &lt;em&gt;British Politics&lt;/em&gt; article which looks at the controversial role of imperial 'heroes' in the most recent national curriculum in history. It asks whether white settlers and their often brutal means of settling are really the most appropriate role models for children in a modern multicultural society, as well as how far access to the character of the country these children call home is restricted when treating Empire simply as a symbol of British greatness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>history curriculum</category>
      <category>LSE</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a1785d76b2d9d33016b32dd6fe40e0b</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LSE Blog Post - Machonomics: George Osborne's Legacy to UK Macroeconomic Governance</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a17841b5fddd424015fdddcc3db01a5</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a17841b5fddd424015fdddcc3db01a5" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;George Osborne was a purveyor of machonomics, an approach to economic policy-making revolving around seemingly bottomless reserves of macho self-confidence. In this blog post for the LSE British Politics and Policy blog site, I argue that Osborne modelled himself in this way on the optimal policy-maker of the so-called time consistency problem of abstract economic theory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This post showcases the analysis contained in my recent &lt;em&gt;British Politics&lt;/em&gt; article on the same theme. It is available in open access view-only format from Springer Nature's &lt;a href="%20http://rdcu.be/vt4p"&gt;Shared It&lt;/a&gt; facility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>London</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841b5fddd424015fdddcc3db01a5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SPERI Comment Blog Post: Economic Uncertainty and Economics Imperialism</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf62c4571c9a</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf62c4571c9a" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question of why uncertainty does not feature more prominently as an economic ontology requires answers that are rooted in intellectual history. This post, the sixth in the SPERI series on uncertainty, searches for them by looking at how economic history has become increasingly colonised by economic theory, and economic theory by mathematics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Sheffield</category>
      <category>Speri</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf62c4571c9a</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SPERI Comment Blog Post: 'Paul Romer on Mathiness and Orthodox Economics Methodology'</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf58d2311a9d</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf58d2311a9d" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent criticisms of the mathiness of many economists has raised the question within the blogosphere of whether a fundamental fault-line has now punctured economics orthodoxy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2015/09/16/paul-romer-on-mathiness-and-orthodox-economics-methodology/"&gt;http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2015/09/16/paul-romer-on-mathiness-and-orthodox-economics-methodology/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Sheffield</category>
      <category>Speri</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841a5fa12d39015fbf58d2311a9d</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Firesouls Blog Post: A Conversation with Professor Matthew Watson, Part 1</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=8a17841b5ab7ac97015abc87bc8828ed</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=8a17841b5ab7ac97015abc87bc8828ed" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;In July 2016 I was invited to the Firesouls office in London by Dan Ebanks, the company's co-founder and CEO. Firesouls has built the Social Value Exchange, an e-auction that enables community groups to bid for resources that might have a transformative effect on the way in which life is lived locally. Dan recorded the conversation that we had about my project research, in the hope that my work on the market concept might serve as useful background information for what Firesouls is trying to do with its Social Value Exchange. The first part of that conversation was posted on the Firesouls blog site on March 7th 2017, with a further part to come.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://medium.com/firesouls-newsreel/a-conversation-with-professor-matthew-watson-part-1-18a600111654#.vwxbdgip1"&gt;https://medium.com/firesouls-newsreel/a-conversation-with-professor-matthew-watson-part-1-18a600111654#.vwxbdgip1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>London</category>
      <category>Firesouls</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a17841b5ab7ac97015abc87bc8828ed</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oxford University Press Blog Post on Brexit: Part 2</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=094d4345578c584601579f7c64af0349</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=094d4345578c584601579f7c64af0349" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the second of the two-part blog post that OUP published on its website on October 6th 2016 to accompany the release of the seventh edition of Baylis, Smith and Owens's &lt;em&gt;The Globalization of World Politics&lt;/em&gt;. It is entitled, 'Brexit and Article 50 Negotiations: Why the Smart Money Might be on No Deal'.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.oup.com/2016/10/brexit-article-50-no-deal/"&gt;http://blog.oup.com/2016/10/brexit-article-50-no-deal/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Oxford</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">094d4345578c584601579f7c64af0349</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oxford University Press Blog Post on Brexit: Part 1</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=094d434557473cac015766a62e8649c4</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=094d434557473cac015766a62e8649c4" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;In August 2016 I was invited by Oxford University Press to do some filming for their website, answering questions on Brexit. This was to help them in their advertising for the seventh edition of Baylis, Smith and Owens's &lt;em&gt;The Globalization of World Politics&lt;/em&gt;, to which I am a contributing author for the chapter on Global Trade and Global Finance. These are two dimensions of the modern-day phenomenon of economic globalisation that will definitely be impacted on by the UK's decision to withdraw from the European Union.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a follow-up to my afternoon filming, I was then asked to write two blog posts for the OUP website. The first was published on September 25th 2016, and is called, 'Brexit and Article 50 Negotiations: What it would take to strike a deal'. This post, along with the accompanying film, can be found via the following link.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.oup.com/2016/09/brexit-article-50-negotiations/"&gt;http://blog.oup.com/2016/09/brexit-article-50-negotiations/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Oxford</category>
      <category>Brexit</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">094d434557473cac015766a62e8649c4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fools' Gold Blog Post on Friedrich List's Role in the Pre-History of Modern-Day Competitiveness Thinking</title>
      <link>https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications/?newsItem=094d434553d8e3440154073bb8995bd7</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="news-thumbnail" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px;"&gt;&lt;img class="thumbnail" width="100" height="100" src="https://warwick.ac.uk/sitebuilder2/file/fac/soc/pais/research/completedprojects/rethinkingthemarket/publications?sbrPage=%2Ffac%2Fsoc%2Fpais%2Fresearch%2Fcompletedprojects%2Frethinkingthemarket%2Fpublications&amp;newsItem=094d434553d8e3440154073bb8995bd7" alt="image"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Friedrich List never once mentioned competitiveness directly by name, but he nonetheless remains an important figure in the pre-history of the Competitiveness Agenda. It would be impossible to present a comprehensive account of the rhetorical structure underpinning that agenda without at least some discussion of his &lt;i&gt;National System of Political Economy&lt;/i&gt;. It was List who first made the case in the 1840s for collective national sacrifice in the interests of stronger future macroeconomic performance. There is no plausible philosophical mechanism in his work to explain why people should agree to the privations following from this sacrifice, in much the same way that no plausible philosophical mechanism operates in the modern-day Competitiveness Agenda to explain why the population should remain passive in the face of a race to the bottom. His argument for choosing national economic champions in the name of future society-wide enrichment therefore looks like an unsubstantiated assertion, and the same surely also applies to the Competitiveness Agenda.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://foolsgold.international/friedrich-list-pre-history-modern-day-competitiveness-thinking/"&gt;http://foolsgold.international/friedrich-list-pre-history-modern-day-competitiveness-thinking/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Fools' Gold</category>
      <category>blog post</category>
      <category>Tax Justice Network</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">094d434553d8e3440154073bb8995bd7</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
