Reference List

Ahmed, S. (2006). Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12(4), 543–574.
Ahmed, S. (2010). 1 Happy Objects. The Affect Theory Reader, 29–51.
Ahmed, S. (2020). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.
Boellstorff, T. (2016). For whom the ontology turns: Theorizing the digital real. Current Anthropology, 57(4), 387–407.
Boellstorff, T. (2020). Rethinking digital anthropology. In Digital anthropology (pp. 39–60). Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Corrigan, P. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59(7), 614.
Crichton, P., Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2017). Epistemic injustice in psychiatry. BJPsych Bulletin, 41(2), 65–70.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography (Vol. 13). Rowman Altamira.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 273–290.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1998). Grounded theory. Strategien Qualitativer Forschung. Bern: Huber, 4.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press.
Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. G. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Psychology Press.
Hardon, A., & Sanabria, E. (2017). Fluid drugs: Revisiting the anthropology of pharmaceuticals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 117–132.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
LeFrançois, B. A., Menzies, R., & Reaume, G. (2013). Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385.
Markham, A., Buchanan, E., & with feedback from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0).
Merleau-Ponty, M., Landes, D., Carman, T., & Lefort, C. (2013). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3–5.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024). Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241229777.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Lewis, T., Hjorth, L., & Postill, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice.
Postill, J. (2014). Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados movement. Ethnography, 15(1), 51–69.
Prescott, J., Rathbone, A. L., & Brown, G. (2020). Online peer to peer support: Qualitative analysis of UK and US open mental health Facebook groups. Digital Health, 6, 2055207620979209.
Rayland, A., & Andrews, J. (2023). From social network to peer support network: Opportunities to explore mechanisms of online peer support for mental health. JMIR Mental Health, 10, e41855.
Scrutton, A. P. (2017). Epistemic injustice and mental illness. In The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 347–355). Routledge.
Sismondo, S., & Greene, J. A. (2015). The pharmaceutical studies reader. John Wiley & Sons.
Wall, S. (2016). Toward a moderate autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1609406916674966.
Thompson, A., Stringfellow, L., Maclean, M., & Nazzal, A. (2021). Ethical considerations and challenges for using digital ethnography to research vulnerable populations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 676–683.