Breaking Bad News
Prompt: Watch 2–3 publicly available training or role‑play videos where clinicians deliver difficult news. Analyse the interaction, focusing on both examples of good and bad practices.
Task overview
Breaking bad news is a core skill in clinical communication. This task involves watching 2–3 short videos made for training purposes where clinicians practise delivering difficult news and discuss points to note. Your goal is to analyse how the clinician structures the conversation, manages the patient’s emotional response, and demonstrates empathy.
You will also compare good practices with bad practices.
To get you started
1. Choose 2–3 videos from the list
Below are some links you could use. They show role plays or simulations in which a clinician delivers difficult news, as well as discussions about this encounter.
- Live Medicine MMI Role Play | Breaking BAD News
| Medic Mind
- Delivering Bad News | UT Health San Antonio
- Breaking Bad News | NHS ESNEFT
2. Observe how clinicians prepare and open the conversation
Make notes on:
- How they introduce themselves
- How they prepare the patients for the bad news, this could include:
- Whether and how they check the patient’s awareness of the situation
- Whether and how they set expectations (“I’m afraid we need to talk about your test results…”)
3. Analyse the delivery of the news
Look for:
- Any cues to signal difficult news is coming (also called ‘warning shots’)
- Clarity vs. vagueness
- Use of simple vs. overly technical language
- Any display of empathy and compassion (e.g., intonation and other non-verbal cues)
- Interaction practices that allow emotional reactions (e.g., pauses, and pacing)
- Ability to respond to emotions
4. Identify good practices
Examples:
- Checking understanding (“Can I pause to check what you’ve taken from this so far?”)
- Display of empathy and compassion through verbal means (“I can see this is a shock…”)
- Display of empathy and compassion through non-verbal means (e.g., allowing silence)
- Means to give space to patients to react and to validate their feelings
- Offering follow‑up or next steps
5. Identify problematic practices
These may include but do not limit to:
- Rushing the conversation due to time pressure
- Using technical jargon without explanation
- Giving too much information at once
- Appearing detached or unempathetic
6. Compare the examples
Write a short comparison to discuss:
- What practices best meet the needs (both communicative and emotional) for the encounter, and why
- Which mistakes are most noticeable in the weaker example(s), and how they impact both the informational and the interpersonal aspects of the encounter
7. Write your conclusion
Summarise:
- What makes breaking bad news sensitive and supportive
- Key strategies professional training could prioritise (e.g., giving warning shots, displaying empathy, summarising)