Insights from pandemic research

by Thiemo Fetzer

The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges and opportunities for research. During this period there was a focus on understanding the economic and social impacts of the pandemic and evaluating policy responses. Through a series of studies, I explored how government actions influenced public health outcomes and economic stability.

Eat Out to Help Out scheme: A case of policy missteps

A significant study investigated the UK’s Eat Out to Help Out scheme, an initiative which aimed to boost the economy by encouraging people to dine out with a 50% discount. However, the policy had unintended consequences. Our research revealed that the scheme led to a significant increase in COVID-19 infections. The government spent nearly a billion pounds on this initiative, which ultimately contributed to a deadly second wave of the virus. This study highlighted the importance of considering public health implications in economic policies and the need for real-time data to inform decision-making.

The impact of ICT failures on public health

Another critical study focused on a data processing error in the UK’s contact tracing system. Due to an Excel spreadsheet reaching its row limit, nearly 16,000 COVID-19 cases were not recorded correctly, which led to untraced contacts and missed isolation orders. This failure demonstrated the fragility of relying on outdated technology for critical public health infrastructure. Our analysis showed that this error could have caused up to 1500 avoidable deaths. This study underscored the necessity for robust digital infrastructure and better data management practices in the public sector.

False negatives and public health risks

Another study examined the consequences of false negative COVID-19 tests by a private testing provider. Around 40,000 individuals received incorrect negative results, leading to further spread of the virus. This error particularly affected the south-west of England, resulting in an estimated 100 avoidable deaths.

This incident revealed the risks associated with privatising critical public health services without stringent oversight and highlighted the need for consistent and accurate testing protocols.

Broader reflections on evidence-based policy making

The pandemic has shown that many governments struggle with evidence-based policy making. High-quality data, skilled analysis, and transparent communication are crucial for effective governance. Research during the pandemic demonstrated that timely and robust scientific evidence could significantly impact public policy and outcomes. It also revealed gaps in digital skills and infrastructure that need to be addressed to improve public sector responses to crises.

There is a need for governments to modernise their digital infrastructure to ensure accurate data collection and processing with training for public sector employees to better understand and utilise data. Policymakers should engage in transparent decision-making processes, use real-time data and communicate clearly with the public.

A stricter oversight of private sector involvement will ensure that companies involved in public health services adhere to stringent standards to avoid errors that can have widespread consequences.

The COVID-19 pandemic has provided valuable lessons on the importance of robust data infrastructure, the risks of inadequate digital tools, and the critical need for evidence-based policy making. By addressing these challenges, we can better prepare for future crises and ensure more effective governance and public health responses.

About the author

• Thiemo Fetzer is Professor of Economics at The University of Warwick and a CAGE Theme Leader

Download the articleLink opens in a new window