Please Note: The main page lists projects via BBSRC Research Theme(s) quoted and then relevant Topic(s).
Using microencapsulation to study biofilm formation
Secondary Supervisor(s): Dr Tim Overton
University of Registration: University of Birmingham
BBSRC Research Themes: Understanding the Rules of Life (Microbiology)
Project Outline
Most bacteria in nature live in biofilms, communities that are usually attached to solid surfaces and protected by a self-produced matrix of polymer molecules. Biofilms are frequently more resistant to a range of antibiotics and toxic compounds and are very difficult to remove from surfaces. For these reasons, biofilms represent a massive problem for humanity, for example causing ~80% of infections, fouling pipes, and increasing fuel usage on ships. The economic impact of biofilms has recently been estimated to be ~ US$4000 billion per year, as well as health and societal impacts (Cámara et al., 2022).
The traditional model of biofilm formation on a solid surface comprises five stages: initial (reversible) attachment; irreversible attachment; proliferation and microcolony formation; maturation; and dispersion (Sauer et al., 2002). This developmental pathway is tightly regulated and depends upon external cues and stimuli, transcriptional factors, and second messengers such as cyclc di-GMP. In most organisms, these processes are not fully understood; even in the best-studied biofilm-forming organisms (eg Pseudomonas aeruginosa), there are still gaps in understanding.
Questions
Key questions include:
- How is primary adhesion of bacteria to solid surfaces mediated?
- How do bacteria sense surface attachment and switch from a planktonic to a sessile (attached) physiology?
- How do sessile bacteria coordinate synthesis of polysaccharides and other matrix components?
Furthermore, there is growing evidence that the traditional five-step model of biofilm formation only represents part of the biofilm story (Sauer et al., 2022). Some bacteria form a type of biofilm called a pellicle that “floats” on the air-liquid interface; other bacteria form clusters that are suspended in growth media. The differences and similarities between biofilms, pellicles, and clusters are still poorly understood, and new methods are needed to better map the full scope of biofilm physiology.
In this project, we will use microfluidics and core-shell microbeads (Håti et al., 2016) as a platform to study biofilm formation. We will generate microbeads, around 50 μm in diameter, containing bacteria and surrounded by a polymer shell. This will allow us to follow bacterial cluster formation over time and measure aspects of physiology such as biofilm morphology, expression of biofilm-relevant genes, and concentrations of c-di-GMP and other second messengers. Altering the chemistry of the shell of the bead will allow us to determine the impact of physicochemical characteristics on biofilm formation and also probe the mechanical properties of the biofilm. Changing the liquid medium inside each bead will also permit investigation of the effect of stimuli on stages of biofilm development.
This project is a multidisciplinary collaboration between Overton, an expert on microbiology of biofilms and single cell analysis, and Bassett, an expert on soft materials in tissue engineering and biomaterials.
References
Cámara M, Green W, MacPhee CE, Rakowska PD, Raval R, Richardson MC, Slater-Jefferies J, Steventon K, Webb JS. Economic significance of biofilms: a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral challenge. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2022 May 26;8(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41522-022-00306-y.
Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2002 Feb;184(4):1140-54. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.4.1140-1154.2002.
Sauer K, Stoodley P, Goeres DM, Hall-Stoodley L, Burmølle M, Stewart PS, Bjarnsholt T. The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Oct;20(10):608-620. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00767-0.
Håti AG, Bassett DC, Ribe JM, Sikorski P, Weitz DA, Stokke BT. Versatile, cell and chip friendly method to gel alginate in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2016; 16 (19): 3718. doi: 10.1039/C6LC00769D.