Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Programme of Events 2025-26


Select tags to filter on
  Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
Wed 14 Jan, '26
-
CRPLA Seminar: Michael Gardiner (Warwick) - ‘Why we embrace nuclear arsenals’
S0.11 and on Teams

Teams access

Mon 2 Feb, '26
-
CRPLA Seminar: Murray Smith (Kent)
S0.18
Thu 26 Feb, '26
-
IAS/CRPLA Seminar: Mario Telò (Berkeley), ‘Apuleius and the Right to Maim'
IAS Seminar Room (C0.02 on ground floor of Zeeman Building)

IAS Visiting Fellow Mario Telò will give a paper drawing on part of his book, currently in production, on Edward Said (The Late Animal: Edward Said, Classicism, and the Limits of Humanism, under contract with Oxford University Press). What does it mean to read Apuleius’s Metamorphoses in the current global crisis? How do images of Palestinian donkeys—moribund yet carrying the burden of transporting people and food in Gaza—change our view of this novel, in which a human turned into donkey is subjected to unceasing physical abuse? This paper answers these and other questions by reading for and with the donkey’s beaten corpus. It considers the necropolitics of form, proposing that we read against the novel’s plot (against its futurist teleology) and focus on the constantly self-renewing present of abuse, and that we interpretively embrace the linguistic difficulty of the text, its burdensome untranslatability (which is disavowed by classicists’ obsession with linguistic mastery) in order to push against our own desire for the abuse to continue. Apuleius’s novel is placed in dialogue with Edward Said’s idea of “bristling” lateness, with Adorno’s notion of musical late style, with recent theoretical work on necropolitics and, especially, with Afropessimism. These approaches help us understand why it matters to read and re-read Apuleius now.

Placeholder

Let us know you agree to cookies