Marking criteria (written) Chinese/Japanese/Korean levels 1/2
Class |
Scale |
Mark |
Descriptor |
|
Language
-accuracy & appropriateness of vocabulary and grammar -range of vocabulary and grammar -use of complex sentence structures -accuracy in characters & punctuation
|
Task fulfilment and response
-understanding of the text - fulfilment of the task -response to the task -ideas -organisation |
|||
First |
Excellent 1st
|
100 |
Work of original and exceptional quality. Merits special recognition.
Exemplary piece of writing |
|
Exemplary accuracy and appropriateness in vocabulary and grammar Exemplary use of a wide range of vocabulary and grammar Highly effective use of complex sentence structures throughout Virtually no mistakes in characters and punctuation |
Exemplary understanding of the text Task fulfilled beyond expectations. Exemplary and original response to the task. Exemplary ideas Exemplary organisation |
|||
94 |
Exceptional work of the highest quality.
Exceptional piece of writing |
|||
Exceptionally accurate and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar Exceptionally wide range of vocabulary and grammar Effective use of complex sentence structures throughout Hardly any mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Exceptional understanding of the text Task fulfilled to highest expectations. Highly clear and original response to the task. Exceptional ideas Exceptional organisation |
|||
High 1st Upper Mid 1st |
88
82 |
Very high quality work.
Highly impressive piece of writing. |
||
Outstanding accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar, with only a small number of minor errors Outstanding range of vocabulary and grammar Appropriate use of complex sentence structures throughout Only a few mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Outstanding understanding of the text Task fulfilled fully and appropriately Very clear and appropriate response to task with some originality. Outstanding ideas. Outstanding organisation |
|||
Lower Mid 1st Low 1st |
78
74 |
Very high quality work
Impressive piece of writing. |
||
Excellent accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar with occasional minor mistakes. Excellent range of vocabulary and grammar Generally complex sentence structures are used appropriately appropriate use of complex sentence structures Only occasional mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Excellent understanding of the text Task fulfilled fully Clear and appropriate response to task Excellent ideas. Excellent organisation
|
|||
Upper Second (2.1) |
High 2.1 Mid 2.1 Low 2.1 |
68
65
62 |
High quality work.
Good piece of writing |
|
Good accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar with some errors that generally do not impede meaning Good range of vocabulary and grammar Complex sentence structures are used. Good use of complex sentence structures. Most characters and punctuation are correct |
Good understanding of the text Good fulfilment of the task. Clear response Most main points are addressed and developed clearly and sufficiently Good ideas Good organisation
|
|||
Lower Second (2.2) |
High 2.2 Mid 2.2 Low 2.2 |
58 55 52 |
Competent work
Adequate piece of writing |
|
Adequate accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar with noticeable errors, some of which impede meaning. Somewhat limited range of vocabulary and grammar, often rather simple, but with some attempts at complexity. Complex sentence structures are attempted with some success. Mistakes in characters but still recognizable; punctuation is adequate. |
Adequate understanding of the text Adequate fulfilment of the task. Many main points are addressed, but some are developed in a simple, inappropriate or unclear manner. Adequate organisation |
|||
Third |
High 3rd
Mid 3rd
Low 3rd
|
48 45 42 |
Work of limited quality
Limited piece of writing |
|
Limited accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar with frequent mistakes affecting comprehension. Limited range of vocabulary and grammar using simpler vocabulary and grammar. Occasional attempts at complex vocabulary and grammar, often unsuccessful Evident mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Limited understanding of the text Limited fulfilment of the task. Most of the main points are addressed, but in a limited or minimum manner. Or some parts may be reasonably expressed, but other parts are omitted or barely mentioned. Limited organisation |
|||
Fail |
High Fail |
38 |
Work does not meet standards required for the level. Evidence of study and demonstrates some knowledge and skills.
Unsatisfactory piece of writing
|
|
Unsatisfactory accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar, with most sentences containing errors that make comprehension difficult Mostly simple vocabulary and grammar Repeated mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Unsatisfactory understanding of the text Unsatisfactory fulfilment of the task. Response is attempted, but unsuccessfully Some main points may be addressed, but they are inadequately or unclearly expressed. Unsatisfactory organisation |
|||
Fail |
32 |
Work is significantly below the standard required for the level. Some evidence of study and skills acquired, but subject to very serious omissions and errors.
Very unsatisfactory piece of writing |
||
Inadequate accuracy and appropriate use of vocabulary and grammar with simple and erroneous vocabulary and grammar that are difficult to understand. Persistent mistakes in characters and punctuation
|
Inadequate understanding of the text Inadequate and unclear fulfilment of the task. Some points are addressed, but they are expressed inadequately and unclearly. |
|||
25 |
Poor quality work well below the standards required for the level.
Wholly inadequate piece of writing |
|||
Low Fail |
12 |
Occasional recognisable words and sentences but they make little sense Little evidence of lexical/grammatical competence. Or not enough language to assess |
Failed fulfilment of the task. Most task elements missing. |
|
Zero |
Zero |
0 |
Work of no merit OR Absent, work not submitted, penalty in some misconduct cases |