The Responsible Use of Generative AI
Overview
Dr Pauldy Otermans is a Reader (Education) in Psychology at Brunel and a female tech leader in the UK. She is the Director of the Education Hub and Employability Lead for the Faculty. Dr Otermans’ research focuses on using AI in education and authentic assessments. Dr Stephanie Baines is a Senior Lecturer (Education) in Psychology at Brunel. She is the Associate Pro Vice Chancellor – Quality Assurance and the former Psychology Undergraduate Programme Lead. Dr Baines’ research focuses on authentic assessments, innovation in teaching & learning in Higher Education and the use of AI in education.
With the rise of Generative AI, we developed a workshop to support our students to use AI in their teaching and learning in a safe and responsible way. For this, we gave a brief overview of AI, Generative AI and tools that can be used. We then explored ChatGPT in detail together with the students. Their understanding and use of a tool such as ChatGPT was then tested in a Level 4 assessment. Here, the students had to share their prompt and the AI’s response in their submission. The learning of AI tools & skills was embedded with other skills development such as digital skills (e.g., using track changes and comments). Students had to critique and revise the ChatGPT output based on their learning using track changes and comments. The performance on this assessment showed an increased level of critical thinking skills in students compared to previous years. However, their digital skills as well as their prompt engineering could be further enhanced which is something we are embedding in a series of workshops for next academic year.
Contributors
Dr Pauldy Otermans (she/her)Link opens in a new window, Brunel University
Dr Stephanie Baines (she/her)Link opens in a new window, Brunel University
Lesson plan
- Academics deliver one or more teaching sessions on the use of Generative AI which started with a brief introduction of 'What is Artificial Intelligence?’, 'What is Machine Learning?’
- Discuss pros and cons with students about the use of Generative AI in Education (in their assessments or as preparation for their assessment).
- Demonstrate different AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity showcasing how prompts work with AI tools.
- A discussion on prompt engineering and what you should pay attention to when prompting an AI.
- Activity with the students on reflecting on the output of AI tools. Students comment on the output of the AI and highlight what is right, wrong, and could be improved.
- For their assessments, students provide a prompt to a Generative AI writing tool and ‘share the link’ in their assessment as well as pasting the AI output a Word document. They then use track changes and comments to critique the output.
- Academics mark the assessment using a rubric and also provide written feedback in terms of ‘three strengths’ and ‘three areas of improvement’.
Tutor's observations
We noticed that students really enjoyed the teaching sessions related to the use of Generative AI tools and found them very useful. Students were really engaged with the interactive aspects of the teaching session. In terms of the assessment, students did use the AI tool, but through the marking it became clear that students were able to critique the output. However, their ability to use track changes and comments could be further enhanced. Many wrote a short paragraph critiquing the AI output. More positively, students demonstrated a good ability to use critical thinking to a degree that had not previously been observed at this level of study. Due to its successful implementation this year, the assessment will be used again next year.
Links to more like this
Categories: dpl_categories
Tools: ChatGPT
Departments: Brunel University, Brunel University