News, Events, CFPs, Jobs and Funding, Reading Groups
Conference: Neo-Latin and issues of style: places and periods 1450–1750
The Society for Neo-Latin Studies (SNLS) is organizing an international conference on Neo-Latin style, to be held in London on 18 and 19 September 2025.
The conference aims to take a more in-depth look at the question of ‘Neo-Latin style’ by asking the following questions: What is meant by ‘style’? What is the early modern and the contemporary terminology to describe this phenomenon? Is there such a thing as ‘Neo-Latin style’? What features of Neo-Latin texts need to be investigated to be able to define their ‘style’? Does the style of Neo-Latin texts develop over the period traditionally defined as that of Neo-Latin literature and, if so, how? Are there any noticeable stylistic differences between texts in prose and in verse and between texts of literary genres? What is the relationship between ‘style’ and translation? How might ‘Neo-Latin’ style differ from the style of classical antiquity? Can one discern any patterns in the use or imitation of particular classical and / or other contemporary authors? Does style differ between texts produced in different countries (by writers with different vernaculars as their native languages)? How might modern research tools and methods (e.g. access to digitized and searchable texts, databases, digital humanities) contribute to research on Neo-Latin style? What has the subject already achieved in terms of research on Neo-Latin style (for instance, the recent research network on ‘Baroque Latinity’) and what would be projects for the future? These (and other) questions will be looked at in broader overviews or by means of individual case studies.
A provisional programme is available here.
All welcome! Please register here to attend by 11 September (free of charge).
Vates journal new edition
Vates issue 15 (first issue of the revived journal) is now published online; a copy can be found here.
Scientific Poetics and Neo-Latin: A Roundtable
RELICS Roundtable: Women as Authors of Latin Literature
Dear Colleagues,
The RELICS research network (http://www.relicsresearch.com) is delighted to invite you to attend our virtual roundtable on
Women as Authors of Latin Literature
Tuesday 11 March 2025
4.00-5.30pm (CET)
Online (link upon registration)
Jane Stevenson (Oxford): ‘Hiding in Plain Sight?’
Johanna Luggin (Innsbruck): 'Agency and Impact: Useful Concepts for the Study of Women Writers?'
Patrick Burns (New York): ‘Initial Steps toward a Linguistic Dataset of Latin Texts Written by Women’
Giacomo Evangelisti and Chiara Bellavegli (Rome): ‘Centre MedioEvA: Ideas for a New Literary Canon’
Skye Shirley (London): 'Women's Latin Writing: Appreciating Abundance'
Anne Larsen and Stephen Maiullo (Holland, MI): 'Women Latin Writers and the Canon: The Case of Anna Maria van Schurman'
Please register via email (relics@ugent.be) before 8 March 2025.
With kind regards,
Alex Tadel (University of Warwick)
Simon Smets (KU Leuven)
Society for Neo-Latin Studies Postgraduate Research Sharing and Feedback Event June 2025: Call for Contributions
The Society for Neo-Latin Studies is organising an online event, to be hosted by the Warburg Institute, for PhD students and ECR colleagues. This will take place between 1-5pm (UK time) on Thursday 5th June 2025. It will consist of presentations on current Neo-Latin or Neo-Greek research projects by postgraduate students and early career researchers, and will serve as an opportunity to share ideas and receive feedback from other scholars in the discipline. This is a call for contributions. Abstracts of 150 words for a presentation of no more than 15 minutes should be sent by 13th April 2025 to Lucy Nicholas (lucy.nicholas@sas.ac.uk) and Gesine Manuwald (g.manuwald@ucl.ac.uk). Please contact us in the meantime if you have any questions.
CfP: COMPARING REAL AND IMAGINED COMMUNITIES IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD
Reflecting functional mechanisms, pragmatic purposes, and moral values of politically organised communities was at the heart of numerous early modern literary genres. Whereas the large corpus of political philosophy and theory might come to mind first, there emerged also more functional sorts of texts, e.g. in the fields of political administration or diplomacy, and a large number of detailed descriptions.
When it comes to delineating the characteristics and organisational structure of political communities in detail, two genres stand out in the early modern period: On the one hand, state descriptions explore contemporary political and administrative systems. Early examples include Lodovico Guicciardini’s description of the Low Countries (1567) and William Camden’s Britannia (1586), but also collections such as Pierre d’Avity’s Les principautez (1613) or whole series such as the ‘Elzevirian Republics’ (1620s and 30s) and the ‘Rengerische Staaten’ (early 18th ct.). On the other hand, literary utopias design fictive communities as discursive counterparts. The most prominent example is certainly Thomas More’s Utopia, which reflects on the contemporary socio-political circumstances in England and, by extension, in Europe in the 16th century. In its aftermath, a number of aemulatores flooded the literary market with their utopian state constructions, some of which were not only meant to be morally edifying treatises, but were also read as guidelines for the construction of a ‘better world’ (e.g. Kaspar Stiblin’s Commentariolus de Eudaemonensium Republica, Johann Valentin Andreae’s Christianopolis or Francis Bacon’s Nova Atlantis). The Italian Dominican Tommaso Campanella (1568–1639) best exemplifies this intellectual trend of connecting the two genres in question: He published a description of the early modern Spanish empire (Monarchia di Spagna) as well as his utopian Città del Sole (Latin version: Civitas Solis, 1623). In the 17th and 18th century, utopian novels with increasingly sophisticated and multi-layered plot lines such as Jacob Bidermann’s Utopia (1640), Samuel Gott’s Nova Solyma (1648) or Ludvig Holberg’s Nicolai Klimii Iter Subterraneum (1741) made a further contribution to the field by addressing contemporary political institutions and societal circumstances often in a satirically inverted form. Due to the fact that early modern utopias frequently operate with intricate narratives, exaggerations and distortions of the contemporary reality, they are often placed in a different discourse than state descriptions, which are rooted in a concrete historical and political reality and are often designed in a purely descriptive way.
Despite this predilection for a narrative design (in the case of utopias) vis-a-vis a descriptive presentation of the contents (in the case of state descriptions), these two genres share many common features: Significantly, they served as objects for systematic comparisons between political communities in various debates and contexts. Practices of comparing were widely used and reflected. For instance, Pierre d’Avity viewed the purpose of state descriptions in enabling readers to compare the state they live in to others and draw conclusions about the quality of their life conditions. During the political consolidation of the Dutch provinces, Hugo Grotius paid tribute to their constitutional system by holding it against the background of ancient states in his Parallelon Rerumpublicarum. In a similar manner, Francesco Sansovino incorporated the second book of More’s Utopia in a series of real state descriptions in his Del governo de i regni e delle republiche cosi antiche come moderne libri XVIII (Venice, 1561). The Spanish bishop and judge Vasco de Quiroga evidently also read Thomas More’s Utopia as a blueprint for an ideal society as he took this treatise as a model to organise the so-called Republicas de los Indios, i.e. ‘hospital towns’ which he set up in the Mexican region Michoacán to restore the societal order after a period of civil unrest. Quiroga’s purpose was to imbue the indigenous population with Christian values and a pious lifestyle in imitation of More’s Utopians.
How do different kinds of formal organisation of knowledge stimulate, induce, and influence certain types of comparisons?
In what kind of debates did comparisons between political communities serve as arguments? How did such debates distinguish or equate ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’ models?
In what ways did specific descriptions shape conditions and theoretical conceptions ofcomparing in early modern times?
What aspects of the materiality of texts facilitated certain practices of comparing?
How do comparisons between political communities interact with early modernevolutions in the field of history and political theory?
In what ways were comparative approaches involved in practical political decisions anddebates? How did they contribute to legitimising or subverting attempts of nation-building?
In which early modern genres do comparisons between real and imagined communitiesprevail and what was their intended target audience?
We are looking forward to receiving contributions from researchers from all pertinent fields of early modern studies. The conference will take place in spring 2026 (presumably in Münster). We plan on publishing the proceedings in a collected volume after the conference. The language of contributions and discussions is English. The deadline for submissions is February 15th 2025.We are confident that the conference will be funded by external donors (travel expenses, accommodation). We are, however, unable to cover the costs of flights from overseas and ask participants from these countries to apply for appropriate funding.Please send an abstract of your contribution (ca. 250 words) and a preliminary title to both organisers, Lukas Reddemann (lukas.reddemann@uni-muenster.de) and Katharina-Maria Schön (katharina-maria.schoen@univie.ac.at).
CfP: RELICS: Roundtable on Gender in Latin Studies
Dear Colleagues,
In the past two years, the research group relics organised online roundtable discussions on the future of Latin studies and education. Excellent impulse talks and vivid discussions made the events a success, which is why we have decided to continue the effort. We continue to focus on topics which last years’ discussions highlighted as particularly relevant for the field. This year, we will look at women as authors of Latin literature from various points of view.
In recent years the study of women authors has grown in importance in Latin studies. This invites us to rethink the field’s boundaries and traditions. We seek perspectives on women, past and present, who used Latin to express themselves. Some view modern feminist theories as vital to the field, while others question their applicability. Does integrating today’s feminist and gender theories risk overlooking the unique contexts of historical texts? Another point of interest is the role of social class and other identity markers in shaping women’s representations. Questions of representation and canon formation remain at the heart of these debates: which texts are privileged, and how do we teach these texts? Finally, we seek input on regional variations in approaches to gender in Latin studies. How do perspectives from different countries interact, and is it possible to trace broader regional approaches shaped by distinct cultural and scholarly traditions? We invite scholars of all career stages to share their ideas on gender in Latin studies with us.
We plan to hold the event on 11 March 2025 over Zoom. The exact time will be decided on the basis of participants’ time zones and will be communicated later. For now, we invite concrete expressions of interest: short thoughts that you would consider worth discussing or more elaborate proposals for a substantial contribution to the discussion. From this, we will select speakers to give impulse talks of five minutes that will serve as a basis for the ensuing discussion.
Proposals and any remaining questions should be sent by 13 January to relics@ugent.be.
With kind regards,
Alex Tadel (University of Warwick)
Simon Smets (KU Leuven)
Conference: Neo-Latin and issues of style: places and periods 1450–1750
The Society for Neo-Latin Studies (SNLS) is organizing an international conference on Neo-Latin style, to be held in London on 18 and 19 September 2025.
The conference aims to take a more in-depth look at the question of ‘Neo-Latin style’ by asking the following questions: What is meant by ‘style’? What is the early modern and the contemporary terminology to describe this phenomenon? Is there such a thing as ‘Neo-Latin style’? What features of Neo-Latin texts need to be investigated to be able to define their ‘style’? Does the style of Neo-Latin texts develop over the period traditionally defined as that of Neo-Latin literature and, if so, how? Are there any noticeable stylistic differences between texts in prose and in verse and between texts of literary genres? What is the relationship between ‘style’ and translation? How might ‘Neo-Latin’ style differ from the style of classical antiquity? Can one discern any patterns in the use or imitation of particular classical and / or other contemporary authors? Does style differ between texts produced in different countries (by writers with different vernaculars as their native languages)? How might modern research tools and methods (e.g. access to digitized and searchable texts, databases, digital humanities) contribute to research on Neo-Latin style? What has the subject already achieved in terms of research on Neo-Latin style (for instance, the recent research network on ‘Baroque Latinity’) and what would be projects for the future? These (and other) questions will be looked at in broader overviews or by means of individual case studies.
A provisional programme is available here.
All welcome! Please register here to attend (free of charge).
Teaching Neo-Latin: texts, materials, didactic challenges: A digital workshop
Event typeWorkshop AddressONLINE VIA ZOOM Event dates