Using objective tests to assess learning

Objective tests are questions whose answers are either correct or incorrect. They tend to be better at testing 'low order' thinking skills, such as memory, basic comprehension and perhaps application (of numerical procedures for example) and are often (though not necessarily always) best used for diagnostic assessment. However, this still affords a great variety of both textual and numerical question types including, but not limited to: calculations and mathematical derivations, MCQs, fill-in-the-blanks questions and short essay (short answer) questions

LSE (2019).

In brief, objectives tests are written tests that require the learner to select the correct answer from among one or more of options or complete statements or perform relatively simple calculations.

What can objective tests assess?

Objective tests are useful to check that learners are coming to terms with the basics of the subject in order that they have a firm foundation and knowledge. They are useful because:

• can test a wide sample of the curriculum in a short time
• can be marked easily; technology can assist with this
• less reliance on language skills of the students
• useful for diagnostic purposes: gaps and muddled ideas can be resolved.

The drawbacks are:

• students can guess rather than know
• the random nature of the questions does not help build mental maps and networks
• writing good questions is not easy
• they tend to focus on lower-order processes: recall rather than judge, explain rather than differentiate.

What alternative assessments could I choose?