Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Project design

Pre-Application Doctoral Communications (PADC 1)

Methods 
  • Literature review of existing scholarship and grey literature on doctoral admissions to synthesise existing findings and best practice. 
  • Webpage analysis of public-facing admissions material on Warwick Doctoral College and departmental webpages. 
  • Data collection across Warwick faculties: 
    • ‘Critical conversations’ in the form of semi-structured interviews about departmental pre-application practices with: PGR Programme Directors and Programme Officers. 
    • Implementation of a reflective practice process for supervisors: simple structured solicited diaries with doctoral supervisors about their actions pre-application, followed by interactive group reflection sessions with selected participants. 
Timeline (2022)
  • Feb-March: Project development; RA recruitment; apply for Ethical Approval; webpage and literature review commence; first Advisory Board meeting
  • April-May: Data collection and analysis
  • June-July: Data analysis; Second advisory Board meeting; report writing; training workshops; conference presentations
  • Beyond July: Academic outputs; conferences 
Data Collection

Participant group  

Participants 

Method 

 

Duration 

Directors of PGR

12

Semi-structured interviews

Approx. 1 hour

Doctoral Programme Officers

8

Semi-structured interviews

 

Approx. 1 hour

Supervisors

19

Diary

6 weeks

Supervisors

11

Focus Group Discussion

Approx. 1 hour

Searching for a Supervisor (PADC2)

Methods 
  • Data collection with minoritised Warwick doctoral students: 
    • 15 interviews with current Warwick doctoral students from minoritised backgrounds who had to seek out a supervisor 
    • Recruitment through relevant student networks  
    • Narrative approach to centre the applicant journey  
  • YouTube video analysis of advice videos about finding a doctoral supervisor 
    • Compile corpus of advice videos  
    • Consider aesthetic, affective and narrative qualities of the videos
    • What advice is actually given? To what extent is disadvantage addressed?  
    • Defining the doctoral advice video genre 
Timeline (2023)
    • Jan-Feb: Establish project; orient placement student intern; apply for Ethical Approval; background reading; video analysis; begin interview recruitment; first Advisory Board meeting
    • Mar-Apr: Conducting interviews; Data analysis; Video analysis
    • May-June: Preparing outputs; Advice video production  
    • July: Second Advisory Board meeting; Staff training workshops; Publish final report; end project  
    • Beyond July: Academic outputs; conferences 
    Data Collection

    Participant group  

    Participants 

    Method 

     

    Duration 

    Warwick Doctoral Candidates

    15

    Narrative interviews

    Approx. 1 hour