Enter a search term into the box below to search for all events matching those terms.
Start typing a search term to generate results.
How do I use this calendar?
You can click on an event to display further information about it.
The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.
The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.
If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.
|12:30pm - 2pm||
'Jurisdictional accumulation: towards non-Eurocentric histories of early modern European empires'
Abstract: This presentation will outline the central argument of a work-in-progress monograph - Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires and Capital. Jurisdictional accumulation is a useful concept to account for various forms of early modern 'extraterritoriality'. It helps provide a more useful narrative of early modern international relations based on the process of jurisdiction, rather than territorial sovereignty or capitalism, while developing a Political Marxist and non-Eurocentric methodology.
Legal histories of extraterritoriality have largely focused upon its various manifestations in the 'semi-sovereign' states and colonies of the nineteenth century. However, the concept of extraterritoriality has also been used in connection with early modern legal practices such as capitulations and other arrangements of shared sovereignty or privileges. This talk examines the term 'extraterritoriality' and the various challenges in using the concept transhistorically and universally. The main dangers - reproducing a Eurocentric and presentist history of international relations - justify a search for an alternative concept.
This search is driven by the need to account for the specificities of early modern empires and establish their connection to various - and often local - jurisdictional strategies, as means to expand imperial authority in a world not yet exclusively defined. However, methodologically, focusing on local or internal jurisdictional strategies often, but not necessarily, 'brings back' the role of European actors, concepts and institutions as central to international history - in the few cases where they have been successfully pushed to the background. It can also be understood to go counter to more 'globalist' approaches. Notwithstanding, it is argued that this renewed yet alternative focus on jurisdictional accumulation in European empires is necessary to the growing efforts to develop non-Eurocentric histories of international law and international relations.