At Warwick, there is a comprehensive ethical scrutiny process to ensure that all research involving human participants, their data and/or tissue, addresses relevant ethical considerations and is subject to appropriate ethical review. Ethical scrutiny is required to protect the rights, safety, dignity and well-being of research participants, to safeguard the researchers conducting the study, and to maintain the research reputation of the university.
Your research will require ethical scrutiny if it involves collection of individual-level information relating to human subjects (including, in some circumstances, deceased human subjects) or if it brings you into an environment where you will have contact with children or vulnerable adults (even if they are not research participants) or if the collection of data involves any risks to your safety as the researcher, or to the safety of any other person involved in the research
Your research will not require ethical scrutiny where you are engaged in purely literature-based research or documentary analysis, or using previously existing datasets where individual-level information is not provided, or using historical records that do not contain individual-level data. If in doubt, you must consult your adviser/supervisor, or the department’s nominated ethics adviser. The burden of responsibility for seeking the necessary scrutiny and approval lies on you.
Graduate and undergraduate students
Students' research proposals may also require ethical approval. This is normally done within the department under rules approved by the university's Humanities & Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC).
Forms to be submittted to gain clearance are available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ris/research_integrity/researchethicscommittees/hssrec/apply/
Currently, all graduate and undergraduate students whose research involves human participants must have their work ethically approved by a member of staff other than their direct supervisor to ensure an independent review. This person will normally be the nominated ethical advisor, or, exceptionally, an alternative staff member within the department.
Ethical review must take place before any participant recruitment or fieldwork commences. It is recommended that ethical approval is sought as soon as possible. Normally, this will take place at the latest:
- At the point at which your dissertation proposal is put forward for acceptance by the department (for undergraduate and taught LLM dissertations, and LLMs by research).
- During the upgrade process (for PhD students).
In order to facilitate an early ethical scrutiny of fieldwork research proposals, the Law School has adopted a Research Ethics Protocol, adherence to which is now a requirement. Click on the link to read it. It has been amended to clarify the issue of retention. You should read and act in accordance with the Protocol.
Postgraduate students - please note: in exceptional cases it may be necessary for full ethical scrutiny to be conducted by HSSREC prior to approval being granted. You should be aware of the schedule of HSSREC meetings and allow sufficient time for your application to be (1) reviewed by the department and, if necessary, (2) referred to HSSREC before you commence participant recruitment or fieldwork. In cases where this procedure is necessary, we strongly recommend you to submit your application not less than four weeks before the next scheduled HSSREC meeting.
PhD students and those undertaking LLMs by research are advised to submit their application using the prescribed HSSREC form for standard or expedited approval, as appropriate. Also available on the same link are a template Participant Information Sheet and a template Consent Form.
Students on taught LLMs or undergraduate awards whose dissertations involve human subject research should include a section on research ethics as an appendix to their proposal form. As a matter of formality the proposal should also include a completed standard prescribed HSSREC Form. This must demonstrate that you have considered the ethical needs and implications of your research and taken appropriate steps to ensure that:
- Informed consent will be obtained from research participants, (where appropriate, you should include the proposed informed consent statement you intend to use).
- Data confidentiality and data protection issues have been properly addressed.
- Steps have been taken assure the wellbeing of any children or vulnerable adults involved in the research, and any necessary CRB checks have been completed.
- Where appropriate, that your safety and the safety of any research participants is properly assured.
- Any other relevant issues of research ethics have been considered.
This appendix does not count towards the normal word limit for your proposal.
Nominated ethics advisor
The Law School’s current nominated Ethics Advisor is Dr Jill Wakefield. You are welcome to contact her for advice and information in preparing your application. Applications for departmental-level ethics approval should be submitted to her by e-mail at email@example.com.
The University's Research and Impact Services (RIS) provide a fuller account of university policies and procedures for ethical scrutiny and approval, including a Warwick code of conduct, a statement on the ethical conduct of research, and other guidance. Please read these carefully.
You may also find it useful to consider other relevant codes or guidelines on the conduct of ethical research, such as that produced by the Socio-Legal Studies Association.
Academic and research staff
Ethical approval from the university's Humanities & Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) is normally required for all human subject research. If the University of Warwick is not the lead organisation for the research and ethical approval has been granted by another institution’s ethics committee it should not be necessary to submit the work for approval at Warwick but the Chair of the HSSREC will require a copy of the approval granted before the research at Warwick commences.