Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Departmental Colloquium, 2024/2025

Colloquia take place from 4.00pm to 5:45pm in S0.18 unless otherwise indicated. For further information, please contact Andrew Cooper (Andrew.Cooper@warwick.ac.uk) or Gemma Basterfield (Gemma.Basterfield@warwick.ac.uk). Details of previous years’ colloquia can be found here.

Select tags to filter on
  Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
Wed 15 Oct, '25
-
Departmental Colloquium - Adrian Alsmith (KCL)
S0.18
Wed 26 Nov, '25
-
Departmental Colloquium - Jennifer Marušić (Edinburgh)
S0.18
Wed 21 Jan, '26
-
Departmental Colloquium Daisy Dixon (Cardiff)
S0.18
Wed 4 Mar, '26
-
Departmental Colloquium - Lidal Dror (Princeton)
S0.18

What’s Wrong with ‘Conceptual Amelioration’?

Conceptual amelioration aims to make the world a more just place by ameliorating our concepts. I offer three arguments against this enterprise as currently practiced, to show how social philosophy aimed at producing social change can be better practiced. First, ameliorators often fail to provide plausible stories to vindicate their claims about how conceptual amelioration will unfold in our non-ideal world. Second, ameliorators’ focus on postulating meanings of ‘concepts’ risks distracting from important normative theorizing about justice. Third, ameliorators tend to overstate the importance of conceptual change for social change. The upshot is that, since such projects tend to be done poorly on their own terms and to evince excessively idealistic views of social change, we should reconsider how to engage in such projects. Drawing on these criticisms, I argue that conceptual amelioration should be conducted in service of ideology critique.

 

Placeholder

Let us know you agree to cookies