Dr Elena Louisa Lange
University of Zurich
9th June 2022 - 12:00-13:30
The Counter-Enlightenment Scheme: Fear, Global Covid-19 Policy, and the New Authoritarian Character
This talk will focus on the civilizational rupture that the Covid-19 pandemic, and especially the political response to it, presents to global liberal democracies. I will show why and how the disenfranchisement of the bourgeois individual subject, through a 2-year long global health emergency campaign based on the deliberate stimulation of panic and fear, led to a collapse of political ideas that are tied to the question of human progress. I call this rupture the counter-enlightenment scheme put to the service of global elites in key functions of capital accumulation. This new notion of a reified humanity - presented in models, simulations, nodes, vectors, “fatality rates” and “cases” - also enabled a new wave of authoritarian characters in the humanities who theoretically aim at abolishing the idea of “society” altogether.
Dr Hourya Bentouhami
Université Toulouse-Jean-Jaurès / Institut Universitaire de France
10th June 2022 - 14:00-15:30 [online only]
Prof. Bernard E. Harcourt
11th June 2022 - 12:00-13:30
What Good Is Genealogy for Praxis?
“In any case, I hate everything that merely instructs me without augmenting or directly invigorating my activity.” It is with those words from Goethe, you will recall, that Nietzsche opened his untimely mediations on history. Perhaps, we should return there to ask some untimely questions about genealogy today.
Amy Allen, Colin Koopman, Daniele Lorenzini, and other critical philosophers have proposed various readings of Foucaultian genealogy—whether problematizing or possibilizing—as a unique method distinct from the debunking genealogical approach of Nietzsche, as well as from the vindication-of-values approach of Bernard Williams. Lorenzini associates his reading with the notions of counter-conduct and the critical attitude Foucault discussed in relation to Kant.
It may be time to strike again and ask the hard question whether any of these interpretations of genealogy are truly fruitful for critical praxis. In this talk, I propose that once again and together we philosophize with a hammer.