Paper for discussion

Chater, N. & Loewenstein, G. (in press). The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017&am

Paper for discussion

Landy, J. F., Jia, M., Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., . . . Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146 , 451–479. doi:10.1037/bul0000220.

Papers for discussion:

Meehl, P. E., (1967). Theory testing in philosophy and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34 (2), pp. 103 - 115. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1086/288135

Meehl, P. E., (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66 (1), pp 195 - 254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195

Paper for discussion:

Szollosi, A., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2022, April 7). Toward Nonprobabilistic Explanations of Learning and Decision-Making. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000355

Paper for discussion:

de Quidt, Jonathan, Johannes Haushofer, and Christopher Roth. 2018. "Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand." American Economic Review, 108 (11): 3266-3302. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20171330

Teams Link

Paper for discussion

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23 (5), pp 524 - 532. doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3 , 159 - 186. doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.43

Teams Link

Paper for discussion:

Mastroianni, AM & Ludwin-Peery, EJ. (2022). Things could be better. OSF.IO/BK7ZT

Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1208-1214. doi:

10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z

Teams Link

Almaatouq, A., Griffiths, T. L., Suchow, J. W., Whiting, M. E., Evans, J., & Watts, D. J. (2022). Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: Integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi:10.1017/S0140525X22002874

Teams Link

Dubova, M., Moskvichev, A., & Zollman, K. (2022, June 24). Against theory-motivated experimentation in science. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/ysv2u

Teams Link

Reiff, J. S., Dai, H., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Benartzi, S. (2023). EXPRESS: Save more today or tomorrow: The role of urgency in pre-commitment design. Journal of Marketing Research. doi:10.1177/00222437231153396

Teams Link

Youyou, W., Yang, Y., & Uzzi, B. (2023). A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of psychology papers over the past two decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.2208863120

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208863120Link opens in a new window

MS Teams Link

M. Serra-Garcia, U. Gneezy, Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd1705 (2021). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1705

Teams Link

Bethmann, Dirk and Bransch, Felix and Kvasnicka, Michael and Sadrieh, Abdolkarim, Home Bias in Top Economics Journals. IZA Discussion Paper No. 15965, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4368839Link opens in a new window or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4368839Link opens in a new window