Warwick Network 2008 Feedback Form

Warwick Network 2008 Feedback

This form has four separate feedback sheets in one.

The first is for the Warwick Network Day as a whole - and the other three are for the breakout sessions that you attended.

You can fill in as much, or as little, as you like.

Warwick Network Feedback Section

Your opinions on the day as a whole.

Please select the category which best describes your opinion of each section.

Please select the category which best describes your opinion of each section. 1 (Very Poor) 2 (Poor) 3 (Average) 4 (Good) 5 (Excellent)

Structure of the Day Rate Structure of the Day as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Structure of the Day as 2 (Poor) Rate Structure of the Day as 3 (Average) Rate Structure of the Day as 4 (Good) Rate Structure of the Day as 5 (Excellent)

Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update Rate Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update as 2 (Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update as 3 (Average) Rate Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update as 4 (Good) Rate Plenary Session: Jon Baldwin, University Update as 5 (Excellent)

Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address Rate Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address as 2 (Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address as 3 (Average) Rate Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address as 4 (Good) Rate Plenary Session: Richard Lambert, Chancellor’s Address as 5 (Excellent)

Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress Rate Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress as 2 (Poor) Rate Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress as 3 (Average) Rate Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress as 4 (Good) Rate Plenary Session: Nigel Thrift, Strategy Progress as 5 (Excellent)

Catering and Refreshments Rate Catering and Refreshments as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Catering and Refreshments as 2 (Poor) Rate Catering and Refreshments as 3 (Average) Rate Catering and Refreshments as 4 (Good) Rate Catering and Refreshments as 5 (Excellent)

Please select the category which best describes your opinion of each statement.

Please select the category which best describes your opinion of each statement. 1 (Strongly Disagree) 2 (Disagree) 3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree) 4 (Agree) 5 (Strongly Agree)

This day was relevant to my role. Rate This day was relevant to my role. as 1 (Strongly Disagree) Rate This day was relevant to my role. as 2 (Disagree) Rate This day was relevant to my role. as 3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree) Rate This day was relevant to my role. as 4 (Agree) Rate This day was relevant to my role. as 5 (Strongly Agree)

This day was of value to me personally. Rate This day was of value to me personally. as 1 (Strongly Disagree) Rate This day was of value to me personally. as 2 (Disagree) Rate This day was of value to me personally. as 3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree) Rate This day was of value to me personally. as 4 (Agree) Rate This day was of value to me personally. as 5 (Strongly Agree)

This day was of value to the University. Rate This day was of value to the University. as 1 (Strongly Disagree) Rate This day was of value to the University. as 2 (Disagree) Rate This day was of value to the University. as 3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree) Rate This day was of value to the University. as 4 (Agree) Rate This day was of value to the University. as 5 (Strongly Agree)

I enjoyed this day. Rate I enjoyed this day. as 1 (Strongly Disagree) Rate I enjoyed this day. as 2 (Disagree) Rate I enjoyed this day. as 3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree) Rate I enjoyed this day. as 4 (Agree) Rate I enjoyed this day. as 5 (Strongly Agree)

Which bit of the day was most valuable?

Which bit of the day was least valuable?

Which bit of the day did you enjoy most?

Which bit of the day did you enjoy least?

How could the Warwick Network be improved?

Do you have any other comments?

11am Breakout Session Feedback

Session Title

Please select the rating that is the best match.

Please select the rating that is the best match. 1 (Very Poor) 2 (Poor) 3 (Average) 4 (Good) 5 (Excellent)

Relevance to my role Rate Relevance to my role as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 2 (Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 3 (Average) Rate Relevance to my role as 4 (Good) Rate Relevance to my role as 5 (Excellent)

Expertise of session leader Rate Expertise of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Expertise of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Expertise of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Presentation skills of session leader Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Facilitation skills of session leader Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Value of session Rate Value of session as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Value of session as 2 (Poor) Rate Value of session as 3 (Average) Rate Value of session as 4 (Good) Rate Value of session as 5 (Excellent)

Importance of issue being discussed to the University Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 2 (Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 3 (Average) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 4 (Good) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 5 (Excellent)

Which bit of the session was most valuable?

Which bit of the session was least valuable?

How could this session be improved?

Do you have any other comments?

1pm Session Feedback

Session Title

Please select the rating that is the best match.

Please select the rating that is the best match. 1 (Very Poor) 2 (Poor) 3 (Average) 4 (Good) 5 (Excellent)

Relevance to my role Rate Relevance to my role as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 2 (Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 3 (Average) Rate Relevance to my role as 4 (Good) Rate Relevance to my role as 5 (Excellent)

Expertise of session leader Rate Expertise of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Expertise of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Expertise of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Presentation skills of session leader Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Facilitation skills of session leader Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Value of session Rate Value of session as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Value of session as 2 (Poor) Rate Value of session as 3 (Average) Rate Value of session as 4 (Good) Rate Value of session as 5 (Excellent)

Importance of issue being discussed to the University Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 2 (Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 3 (Average) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 4 (Good) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 5 (Excellent)

Which bit of the session was most valuable?

Which bit of the session was least valuable?

How could this session be improved?

Do you have any other comments?

2pm Session Feedback

Session Title

Please select the rating that is the best match.

Please select the rating that is the best match. 1 (Very Poor) 2 (Poor) 3 (Average) 4 (Good) 5 (Excellent)

Relevance to my role Rate Relevance to my role as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 2 (Poor) Rate Relevance to my role as 3 (Average) Rate Relevance to my role as 4 (Good) Rate Relevance to my role as 5 (Excellent)

Expertise of session leader Rate Expertise of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Expertise of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Expertise of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Expertise of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Presentation skills of session leader Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Presentation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Facilitation skills of session leader Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 2 (Poor) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 3 (Average) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 4 (Good) Rate Facilitation skills of session leader as 5 (Excellent)

Value of session Rate Value of session as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Value of session as 2 (Poor) Rate Value of session as 3 (Average) Rate Value of session as 4 (Good) Rate Value of session as 5 (Excellent)

Importance of issue being discussed to the University Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 1 (Very Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 2 (Poor) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 3 (Average) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 4 (Good) Rate Importance of issue being discussed to the University as 5 (Excellent)

Which bit of the session was most valuable?

Which bit of this session was least valuable?

How could this session be improved?

Do you have any other comments?

Privacy notice

The data collected here is used solely to help us improve future events.
The University of Warwick is the Data Controller of any information you have entered on this form and is committed to protecting the rights of individuals in line with Data Protection Legislation. The University's Data Protection webpages provide further information on your rights and how the University processes personal data. If you wish to submit a data subjects rights request, make a complaint or report a suspected personal data breach, please contact the University’s Data Protection Officer by email at infocompliance@warwick.ac.uk.

Spam prevention

Failure to load reCAPTCHA

reCAPTCHA is a utility used to verify you're not a robot filling out this form. Unfortunately this has failed to load correctly.

Please try reloading the page. If the problem persists, or if you are in a country which blocks Google products, please contact us by using the ‘page contact’ link at the foot of this page.