To what extent are the aetiology and symptomatology of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comparable between civilians and soldiers?
Aleena Uppal
I am a second year Psychology undergraduate. My essay explores the differences between the presentation of PTSD in civilians and soldiers, and the interdisciplinary explanations for both social groups. My passion for this topic was inspired by an essay on shell shock within the module.
About the Project
Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychological disorder initiated from witnessing a traumatic event such as war. Previous research has recognised that the prevalence of PTSD is positively correlated in populations affected by conflict. To further examine the relationship of conflict and PTSD, this essay was based on an analysis of previous literature and research studies. The results from previous research were collated to understand the effects of conflict-arisen PTSD on different social groups. These social groups are civilians and soldiers. Prior empirical research examining the effect of conflict-related trauma on PTSD has significantly informed the implementation of treatment approaches utilised by clinicians to meet patients' individual needs.
This essay looks at alternating views of PTSD, analysing key debates such as universal and cultural interpretations of conflict associated PTSD and the effect of cultural biases whilst interpreting symptomatology. These cultural biases can skew the approaches taken when treating individuals with conflict associated with PTSD. Historically, early PTSD research is heavily focused on veterans. This essay aims to look at a comprehensive array of groups and bridge the gap of historically underrepresented groups in PTSD research, to draw a more substantiated conclusion on how conflict stimulates the effects of PTSD. This essay allows for consideration of diversifying treatment options based on conclusions that are derived from a wider range of literature and an interplay of social and cultural factors.