Welcome to the WJETT blog
What is WJETT?
The WJETT blog or Warwick Journal of Education - Transforming Teaching blog is designed to encourage staff and students to disseminate good practice and to engage with their peers on academic cultural critique or areas of research that they find interesting. With the increased focus on ‘teachers as researchers’ in the sector, many qualified teachers are expected to publish the outcomes of any action research projects they undertake. The WJETT blog can be the first step on your journey towards publishing and enables you to experience publishing and reviewing in a friendly and supportive environment.
You will need to scroll down the page below the tags to see the posts.
Science Cascade Day
This post is a summary of my article published in May 2018 in Science Teacher Education: 82; 13-18. Science Cascade Days are used to support the development of science subject knowledge and trainee confidence in teaching science for primary and early years PGCE trainees. March 2018 was the fourth time they have been held in the current format, run in partnership with the University’s Life Sciences department. Thanks are due to colleagues in Life Sciences who lead training and facilitate the cascade days. One day is spent with trainees being trained in observational and practical skills. This includes being ‘nature detectives’ in the Tocil Wood Nature Reserve, pond dipping, and using the laboratory equipment to make detailed observations of collected samples, which are tested for oxygen produced by pond-oxygenating plants and using computer software for testing their own reaction times. Trainees then cascade their learning to children from local schools. Each year, two different schools are invited: one bringing Year 2 children (age 6-7), the other upper Key Stage 2 (age 9-11) pupils for a day on campus, again based at Life Sciences.
Like other Initial Teacher Education (ITE) providers, the University of Warwick sets initial subject knowledge audits for its primary and early years (EY) Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) trainees in English, mathematics and science. Observations of, implications of and responses to the results for science discussed here were initially presented at the ASE Futures Group ITT-Meet, ‘Strengthening Initial Science Teacher Education’, at the University of Leicester in May 2017 and many aspects were corroborated by primary colleagues from other primary ITE providers who attended.
The questions addressed are: ‘What do the audit scores and additional information tell us?’ and ‘What do we do with it?’, on an individual trainee and cohort level. Our main focus is on trainees who show an initial score ≤ 60%. Some self-identify as needing low support and just revision, as their science subject knowledge may be rusty, especially for mature career changers. There are sometimes observable disparities between audit score, high or low, and trainees’ self-awareness and self–efficacy in the subject, observed in seminar participation.
Those trainees with weaker science subject knowledge and confidence are directed to an enhanced, provision opportunity - the science cascade days.
The schools invited are chosen to meet university widening participation criteria, such as having high numbers of pupils eligible for pupil premium, with little everyday opportunity to engage with the natural environment.
The Y2 children visit the nature reserve as nature detectives and use laboratory equipment to closely observe collected specimens under magnification. They also enjoy meeting ‘The Animal Man.’
The KS2 children work in a separate lab following pond dipping, observing specimens, oxygen collection and testing and investigating reaction time.
Schools, children and staff are enthusiastic about the day, all benefit from engaging with university and the natural environment. Trainees show increased confidence in teaching science outdoors: e.g. “It gave me real confidence; I loved seeing the children’s enthusiasm and excitement.”
Writing guidance
Can I write about anything in my blog post?
Yes pretty much. Academic cultural critique (Thomson and Mewburn, 2013) is always a good source of content for academic blogs. This can include (but is not limited to) comments and reflections on funding; higher education policy or academic life. You might also want to consider blogging about:
- Academic practice (Saper, 2006)
- Information and/or self-help advice
- Technical, teaching and careers advice
- Your research or practice
- How you’ve undertaken research
- The impact of research on your practice
- An area of research/practice that interests you
- Your teaching experiences/reflections
How long can my blog post be?
Each individual blog post should be no longer than 500 words. Long blocks of text are sometimes hard for readers to digest. Break up your content into shorter paragraphs, bullet points and lists whenever possible. Also include a list of keywords or tags as this makes it easier for Google to find your work.
Do I need to use citations?
No, this is a reflective piece so it does not need to include citations (but you obviously can include them if they are relevant).
Can I include links or images?
We would encourage you to include links to any articles that you have considered whilst writing your blog post. We also welcome the use of images (as long as you have permission to use them) as they can often help to illustrate a point and obviously will not be included in the word limit. Please remember this is a public site so if you want to include images of your students in your classes then you will need permission to do this.
What is the process for submitting a piece of work?
Your blog post should be emailed to A.Ball.1@warwick.ac.uk. Once the submission has been reviewed it will either be uploaded at the beginning of the next available week or sent back to you for editing if it requires amendments. You should then send the amended work to me once again and I will then upload it.