Ioanna Manolopoulou (University College London)

Bayesian observation modeling in presence-only data

The prevalence of presence-only samples eg. in ecology or criminology has led to a variety of statistical approaches. Aiming to predict ecological niches, species distribution models provide probability estimates of a binary response (presence/absence) in light of a set of environmental covariates. Similarly, statistical models to predict crime use propensity indicators from observable attributes inferred from incidental data. However, the associated challenges are confounded by non-uniform observation models; even in cases where observation is driven by seemingly irrelevant factors, these may distort estimates about the distribution of occurrences as a function of covariates due to unknown correlations. We present a Bayesian non-parametric approach to addressing sampling bias by carefully incorporating an observation model in a partially identifiable framework with selectively informative priors and linking it to the underlying process. Any available information about the role of various covariates in the observation process can then naturally enter the model. For example, in cases where sampling is driven by presumed likelihood of detecting an occurrence, the observation model becomes a proxy of the presence/absence model. We illustrate our methods on an example from species distribution modeling and a corporate accounting application.

Joint work with Richard Hahn from Chicago Booth.

Tom Palmer (Warwick Medical School)

Topics in instrumental variable estimation: structural mean models and bounds

One aim of epidemiological studies is to investigate the effect of a risk factor on a disease outcome. However, these studies are prone to unmeasured confounding and reverse causation. The use of genotypes as instrumental variables, known as Mendelian randomization studies, are one way to overcome this.

In this talk I describe some methods in instrumental variable estimation; structural mean models and nonparametric bounds for the average causal effect. Specifically, I describe how to estimate structural mean models using multiple instrumental variables in the generalized method of moments framework common in Econometrics. I describe the nonparametric bounds for the average causal effect of Balke and Pearl (JASA, 1997) which can be applied when each of the three variables; instrument, intermediate, and outcome are all binary.

I describe some methodological extensions to these bounds and their limitations.

To demonstrate the models I use a Mendelian randomization example investigating the effect of being overweight on the risk of hypertension in the Copenhagen General Population Study. I will also draw some comparisons with the application of instrumental variables to correct for noncompliance in randomized controlled trials.

Ajay Jasra (National University of Singapore)

On the convergence of Adaptive sequential Monte Carlo Methods

In several implementations of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods, it is natural and important in terms of algorithmic efficiency, to exploit the information on the history of the particles to optimally tune their subsequent propagations. In the following talk we provide an asymptotic theory for a class of such adaptive SMC methods. Our theoretical framework developed here will cover for instance, under assumptions, the algorithms in Chopin (2002), Jasra et al (2011), Schafer & Chopin (2013). There are limited results about the theoretical underpinning of such adaptive methods: we will bridge this gap by providing a weak law of large numbers (WLLN) and a central limit theorem (CLT) for some of the algorithms. The latter seems to be the first result of its kind in the literature and provides a formal justification of algorithms that are used in many practical scenarios. This is a joint work with Alex Beskos (NUS/UCL).

Piotr Fryzlewicz (London School of Economics)

Wild Binary Segmentation for multiple change-point detection

We propose a new technique, called Wild Binary Segmentation (WBS), for consistent estimation of the number and locations of multiple change-points in data. We assume that the number of change-points can increase to infinity with the sample size. Due to a certain random localisation mechanism, WBS works even for very short spacings between the change-points, unlike standard Binary Segmentation. On the other hand, despite its use of localisation, WBS does not require the choice of a window or span parameter, and does not lead to significant increase in computational complexity. WBS is also easy to code. We provide default recommended values of the parameters of the procedure and show that it offers very good practical performance. In addition, we provide a new proof of consistency of Binary Segmentation with improved rates of convergence, as well as a corresponding result for WBS.