Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Senate Sub-Group

Membership 2021/22

Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Education) (Chair)

Professor Christopher Hughes

Co-Chairs of AQSC (Deputy Chairs)

Professor Andrew Clark

Professor William Curtis

External Advisory Consultant (Quality & Standards) Professor David Lamburn
Academic Director (Postgraduate Taught) Lee Griffin

Chairs of Faculty Boards (or their deputies)

Professor Penny Roberts (Arts)

Professor Lorenzo Frigerio (Science, Engineering and Medicine)

Professor Nick Vaughan-Williams (Social Sciences)

Faculty Education Committee Chairs (or deputies)

Professor Sarah Richardson (Arts)

Professor David Davies (Science, Engineering and Medicine)

Dr Naomi Waltham-Smith (Social Sciences)

Academic Registrar Dr Chris Twine
Chief External Examiner Professor Denis Wright
Members to be co-opted for specific expertise (i.e. Chairs of FYBOE) TBC

The year after a member’s name indicates that their term of office expires on 31 July of that year.

In Attendance

Director of Education Policy & Quality
Senior Assistant Registrar (Teaching Quality)
Assistant Registrar (Assessment)
Exams Office Manager
Student Records Manager

Terms of Reference

1. To consider recommendations for appointment to the role of External Examiner against the criteria laid down for appointments (in relation to this extant term, the Chief External Examiner and Faculty Education Committee Chairs will not attend for these considerations).

2. To discharge responsibility on behalf of the Senate for consideration and approval of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Decision Record Logs, setting out awards to be made in the name of the University.

3. To uphold, reject or moderate the recommendations of the departmental Examination Boards to maximise the consistency of approach across academic departments.

4. To follow up on issues of concern to identify and address any systemic problems.

5. To receive reports on specific actions taken by the Special Cases Committee.

Return to top

Reporting Structure

The Senate Sub-Group has delegated authority from the Senate.

Click here to see a diagrammatic representation of the Committee Structure.

Return to top

Secretariat

Secretary: Louise Hasler, Senior Assistant Registrar (Teaching Quality), Education, Policy and Quality
L.Hasler@warwick.ac.uk 
Assistant Secretary: Geraldine Connelly, Assistant Registrar (Assessment), Education, Policy and Quality
G.Connelly@warwick.ac.uk

Return to top

Meetings

The Senate Sub-Group meets on at least three occasions over the summer period in order to:

  • Consider recommendations and ensure that the outcomes for all first year students are released at the same time in a consistent and systematic manner
  • Consider and approve pass lists to enable the conferment of final year undergraduate awards
  • Confirm the progression of postgraduate taught students to the dissertation phase or confer final awards.

Responsibilities of the Chief External Examiner

The responsibilities of the Chief External Examiner are as follows:

  • Attend meetings of the Senate Sub-Group with delegated authority from the Senate at which decisions on the approval of pass lists/DRLs for UG and PGT courses in relation to awards are made and ensure that those recommendations have been reached by means consistent with the University’s requirements and, if required, with the exceptional practice that the University has undertaken to address a force majeure (Reg. 41);
  • Provide advice and act as sounding board on the appropriateness of the University's approach to addressing the particular challenges presented as a result of force majeure circumstances, if required;
  • Ensure that the responsibilities of the SSG relating to oversight of students’ eligibility for an award are fully and properly discharged in accordance with the assessment conventions;
  • Receive the SSG data regarding courses and cohorts and participate in discussions at the SSG regarding course performance. These observations should be included in a Chief External Examiner report;
  • Report to the University on the effectiveness of the approach to assessment and the conduct of the SSG and any matters arising in accordance with the University’s requirements for such reports.