Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Why Co-Create?

What is co-creation?

Co-creation has many definitions and interpretations.


For example: "Co-creation aims to bridge the gap between possibilities and sustainable solutions. In co-creation, people connect to recognise their shared reality, to set a common goal and, from this, to arrive at actions that are binding for everyone. Co-creation shows us how to uncover our hidden potentials." (Michalik, 2023). 


Or more specifically in education: "A collaborative, reciprocal process through which all participants have the opportunity to contribute equally, though not necessarily in the same ways, to curricular or pedagogical conceptualisation, decision-making, implementation, investigation, or analysis." (Cook-Sather et al, 2014).


For when working with students: "When staff and students work collaboratively with one another to create components of curricula and/or pedagogical approaches." (Bovil et al, 2016).


In our context, think of co-creation as a way of working with students in a more meaningful and collaborative way, by bringing students in to work as part of your team. Student co-creation refers to the practice of working with students as equal partners and putting student experiences at the heart of our work.

Students can support projects, workstreams or initiatives by bringing in their own perspectives and helping the team connect with the rest of the student body. It is a way of building a relationship and community with students and ensuring that our projects and initiatives have student voices at their heart.  

This should be achieved through paid opportunities where students can work as Co-creation Officers.

Why work with students?

The University is home to nearly 30,000 students and they hold countless experiences, as well as useful information and context that we may not be able to see from a staff perspective. By involving and talking to students we are more likely to create longer-lasting or better provisions for future users, especially if your workstream will have an impact on student experience. Even if your work doesn't, it's valuable to have a diverse range of experiences and ways of thinking that can be difficult to achieve using staff alone. Students are not just learning, but are an invaluable source to learn from. They come with their own talents and skills, ones that brought them to, and keep them at, the University.  

Co-creation can take different forms for different projects and pieces of work,it isn't a one-size-fits-all. The purpose and shape of the student co-creation will depend on the desired outcomes. It could range from a deep-dive student insight session to employing students as staff within your team.

Co-creation adds an additional element to any project work, that is without a doubt. But it can also allow you to build out the depth and breadth of any project- it will allow you to bring in not just new ways of thinking, but an external perspective of someone not in a staff stream. This will allow you to be constructively challenged, and whilst this is difficult, it can open you up to avenues you hadn’t considered. By involving the student's voice, you're contributing to the view that students opinions and needs matter, something pivotal to us as an institution.


Benefits of co-creation include:

  • Educational Innovation - The breakdown of traditional hierarchy creates spaces for enabling environments in which new ideas can be shared. This creates transformative opportunities for change in the institution.
  • Inclusivity and Kindness - Co-creation aims to create non-judgemental spaces for individuals to bring their whole authentic selves to the role and bring in their unique perspectives.
  • Community/Relationships- Staff and students working together creates a stronger sense of community at Warwick.
  • Student Skills Development - The Co-creation Officer role can provide students with opportunity to gain new skills.

How might co-creation look in practice?

Students (recruited via Unitemps) can join your project team to support particular workstreams or activities. If the project directly impacts on students, e.g. a product or service they use then student co-creation will be key to creating a better, more accurate provisioning for the project.

It is also important to consider whether your project will indirectly have an impact on students, and how large that input is. You can have information gathering sessions with the students, they can support with testing and designing things, they can also help you connect with the wider student body through supporting events, focus groups, etc. Students can also join certain project meetings and help influence decision-making.   

When implemented effectively, this approach will allow us to lead projects with an increased awareness of the student experience, insight into specific academic departments, and an enhanced understanding of life at Warwick. This approach will also reinforce Warwick’s reputation as an innovative institution, by promoting a cultural change in how we work and challenging traditional institutional hierarchies.  

If you are unsure about whether co-creation is right for your project, then please reach out to to get advice and guidance on student involvement. Consideration must be placed on the capacity and ability to support the student within the project, there must be resource to line manage and help the student.

When is the best time to co-create?

In general, you will find that students will be interested in these opportunities across the academic year and the summer period. However, the time of year you recruit will depend on the students you can recruit. For example, if you are recruiting in the summer (e.g. June, July) and plan to have a 9-month post, you may not be able to recruit final year students (unless they are confirmed to start a postgraduate course at Warwick). You may also be limited as students are only permitted to work when they are in the UK, and therefore international students who are going home over the summer may not be able to work during this period.

Equally, if you are recruiting at the start of the academic year, it may be more difficult for first-year students to come on board. It also goes back to the question above. If you require students for a long-term basis, consider how you will manage that in terms of the academic year. These are all things to consider, but there is no right or wrong answer.

In terms of 'when' during your project, it is recommended that students are involved from start to finish. The diagram below illustrates that students can and should be involved at all stages of a project, such as from initial exploration of the idea, through to the planning, scoping and discovery, to the delivery of the project, as well as continued learning and improvement which comes afterwards. The type of involvement may vary across these stages. For example, when you have an idea for a project, it might be good to organise sessions with students to explore the idea in more detail. Once you have done this, students can support with planning, for example through carrying out information gathering activities. During the delivery of the projects, students can be involved in running focus groups, workshops, attending meetings, etc. Once the project is completed, co-creation officers can be involved in measuring the impact of your work on the student body, and investigating opportunities for future work in the area.

References:

  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships.Higher Education, 71, 195-208.
  • Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19Link opens in a new window(3Link opens in a new window), 186–198.
  • Michalik, G. (2023). Co-creation. In Co-Creation Mindset: Eight Steps towards the Future of Work (pp. 17-34). Cham: Springer International Publishing.