Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine

Project Overview

The document explores the transformative role of generative AI, particularly the Med-Gemini model, in medical education and practice. Med-Gemini is noted for its advanced capabilities in clinical reasoning, multimodal understanding, and long-context processing, which enable it to excel in tasks such as medical question answering and generating referral letters or simplified summaries from complex medical documents. These features not only enhance clinician efficiency and reduce cognitive load but also hold promise for real-world applications in clinical settings and biomedical research. The document underscores the importance of rigorous evaluation and responsible AI practices, addressing challenges related to dataset quality and the need for comprehensive assessments of AI-generated content, including feedback from physicians. Overall, it highlights the potential of generative AI to significantly improve medical education and clinical workflows while advocating for caution and thorough evaluation before widespread deployment.

Key Applications

Med-Gemini for Clinical Documentation

Context: Medical education and clinician support through advanced AI models for generating and summarizing clinical documents such as after-visit summaries, referral letters, and EHR data retrieval.

Implementation: Utilized fine-tuned Gemini models with long-context capabilities to analyze, generate, and summarize lengthy patient records and clinical documents based on outpatient medical notes and detailed medical notes.

Outcomes: Achieved improved efficiency in accessing and generating patient information, higher accuracy and succinctness in summaries and referral letters, enhanced understanding for patients and healthcare providers, and better communication between healthcare professionals.

Challenges: Need for rigorous evaluation before real-world deployment, ensuring clarity and relevance in generated summaries, potential biases in data and model outputs, and addressing data quality issues.

Multimodal Medical Data Analysis

Context: Medical data analysis for educational purposes involving radiology images, surgical videos, and associated medical texts, enhancing medical training and diagnostics.

Implementation: AI models are fine-tuned using large multimodal datasets (e.g., MIMIC-CXR, ECG-QA, Path-VQA) to improve their understanding and generation of medical content, including video analysis for surgical education.

Outcomes: Enhanced capability of AI to interpret and generate medical information from diverse inputs, leading to better diagnostic support and improved training outcomes through effective video analysis.

Challenges: Complexity of medical data and potential for AI misinterpretation of nuanced medical concepts, as well as the need for further refinement to ensure accuracy and reliability in clinical settings.

Implementation Barriers

Technical

LLMs exhibit suboptimal clinical reasoning and may produce erroneous conclusions due to biases and data quality issues. Challenges related to the quality and completeness of training datasets for AI models.

Proposed Solutions: Implement rigorous validation and fine-tuning processes, including expert review and feedback mechanisms. Regular updates and curation of training datasets to ensure they reflect current medical knowledge and practices.

Operational

Integration of AI systems into clinical workflows requires significant adjustments and training for healthcare professionals.

Proposed Solutions: Provide comprehensive training programs and create user-friendly interfaces for clinicians.

Ethical and Regulatory

Concerns around model biases and the implications of AI decisions in safety-critical medical environments. Need for compliance with healthcare regulations and ethical standards in AI deployment.

Proposed Solutions: Conduct ongoing audits of model performance, ensure diverse training datasets to mitigate bias, and engage with regulators and stakeholders to establish guidelines for responsible AI use in medical settings.

Bias and Fairness

Risk of AI models reflecting or amplifying historical biases present in training data.

Proposed Solutions: Developing frameworks for evaluating fairness and implementing bias mitigation strategies throughout the model development process.

Accuracy Limitations

AI-generated content may not always accurately reflect the patient's medical history or referral reasons, leading to possible miscommunication.

Proposed Solutions: Incorporating feedback mechanisms from medical professionals to refine AI outputs and ensure accuracy.

Project Team

Khaled Saab

Researcher

Tao Tu

Researcher

Wei-Hung Weng

Researcher

Ryutaro Tanno

Researcher

David Stutz

Researcher

Ellery Wulczyn

Researcher

Fan Zhang

Researcher

Tim Strother

Researcher

Chunjong Park

Researcher

Elahe Vedadi

Researcher

Juanma Zambrano Chaves

Researcher

Szu-Yeu Hu

Researcher

Mike Schaekermann

Researcher

Aishwarya Kamath

Researcher

Yong Cheng

Researcher

David G. T. Barrett

Researcher

Cathy Cheung

Researcher

Basil Mustafa

Researcher

Anil Palepu

Researcher

Daniel McDuff

Researcher

Le Hou

Researcher

Tomer Golany

Researcher

Luyang Liu

Researcher

Jean-baptiste Alayrac

Researcher

Neil Houlsby

Researcher

Nenad Tomasev

Researcher

Jan Freyberg

Researcher

Charles Lau

Researcher

Jonas Kemp

Researcher

Jeremy Lai

Researcher

Shekoofeh Azizi

Researcher

Kimberly Kanada

Researcher

SiWai Man

Researcher

Kavita Kulkarni

Researcher

Ruoxi Sun

Researcher

Siamak Shakeri

Researcher

Luheng He

Researcher

Ben Caine

Researcher

Albert Webson

Researcher

Natasha Latysheva

Researcher

Melvin Johnson

Researcher

Philip Mansfield

Researcher

Jian Lu

Researcher

Ehud Rivlin

Researcher

Jesper Anderson

Researcher

Bradley Green

Researcher

Renee Wong

Researcher

Jonathan Krause

Researcher

Jonathon Shlens

Researcher

Ewa Dominowska

Researcher

S. M. Ali Eslami

Researcher

Katherine Chou

Researcher

Claire Cui

Researcher

Oriol Vinyals

Researcher

Koray Kavukcuoglu

Researcher

James Manyika

Researcher

Jeff Dean

Researcher

Demis Hassabis

Researcher

Yossi Matias

Researcher

Dale Webster

Researcher

Joelle Barral

Researcher

Greg Corrado

Researcher

Christopher Semturs

Researcher

S. Sara Mahdavi

Researcher

Juraj Gottweis

Researcher

Alan Karthikesalingam

Researcher

Vivek Natarajan

Researcher

Contact Information

For information about the paper, please contact the authors.

Authors: Khaled Saab, Tao Tu, Wei-Hung Weng, Ryutaro Tanno, David Stutz, Ellery Wulczyn, Fan Zhang, Tim Strother, Chunjong Park, Elahe Vedadi, Juanma Zambrano Chaves, Szu-Yeu Hu, Mike Schaekermann, Aishwarya Kamath, Yong Cheng, David G. T. Barrett, Cathy Cheung, Basil Mustafa, Anil Palepu, Daniel McDuff, Le Hou, Tomer Golany, Luyang Liu, Jean-baptiste Alayrac, Neil Houlsby, Nenad Tomasev, Jan Freyberg, Charles Lau, Jonas Kemp, Jeremy Lai, Shekoofeh Azizi, Kimberly Kanada, SiWai Man, Kavita Kulkarni, Ruoxi Sun, Siamak Shakeri, Luheng He, Ben Caine, Albert Webson, Natasha Latysheva, Melvin Johnson, Philip Mansfield, Jian Lu, Ehud Rivlin, Jesper Anderson, Bradley Green, Renee Wong, Jonathan Krause, Jonathon Shlens, Ewa Dominowska, S. M. Ali Eslami, Katherine Chou, Claire Cui, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu, James Manyika, Jeff Dean, Demis Hassabis, Yossi Matias, Dale Webster, Joelle Barral, Greg Corrado, Christopher Semturs, S. Sara Mahdavi, Juraj Gottweis, Alan Karthikesalingam, Vivek Natarajan

Source Publication: View Original PaperLink opens in a new window

Project Contact: Dr. Jianhua Yang

LLM Model Version: gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

Analysis Provider: Openai

Let us know you agree to cookies