Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Concept Navigation and Classification via Open-Source Large Language Model Processing

Project Overview

The document explores the utilization of generative AI, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), in the educational sector, emphasizing a hybrid framework that integrates machine learning with human validation to identify and classify latent constructs in texts. This innovative approach enhances the accuracy and interpretability of concept identification, proving especially effective in analyzing political discourse and media framing. By showcasing the advantages of LLMs over traditional natural language processing (NLP) methods, the findings indicate that generative AI can significantly advance educational practices, enabling educators and researchers to better understand complex textual data. The outcomes suggest that LLMs not only streamline the analysis process but also contribute to more nuanced insights, ultimately facilitating improved educational outcomes and fostering a deeper comprehension of various subjects.

Key Applications

Utilizing LLMs for discourse analysis and theme classification

Context: Analyzing political discourse and educational policy debates in various academic contexts, including European Parliamentary debates and US newspaper articles, as well as discussions in educational policy.

Implementation: Employing LLMs to summarize texts, identify themes, and classify narratives, complemented by iterative sampling and human-in-the-loop validation to refine constructs and ensure relevance.

Outcomes: Facilitates improved understanding of political and educational narratives, enhances interpretability of constructs such as frames, topics, and policy implications.

Challenges: Dependence on human expertise for conceptual validation, continuous oversight required to ensure relevance and precision, and ambiguity in complex texts.

Implementation Barriers

Technical

Limitations of LLMs in fully capturing nuanced human constructs without ambiguity.

Proposed Solutions: Integrating human expertise into the validation process to refine outputs.

Resource

High demand for domain-specific knowledge to validate and refine constructs.

Proposed Solutions: Crowdsourcing platforms to recruit human annotators or research assistants for validation tasks.

Project Team

Maël Kubli

Researcher

Contact Information

For information about the paper, please contact the authors.

Authors: Maël Kubli

Source Publication: View Original PaperLink opens in a new window

Project Contact: Dr. Jianhua Yang

LLM Model Version: gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

Analysis Provider: Openai

Let us know you agree to cookies