Curriculum, Programme and Assessment Development Actions
Curriculum, programme and assessment development actions
Identified by departments
The actions reflect institution‑wide priorities for strengthening curriculum design, programme development and assessment practice. They highlight a shared commitment to aligning programmes with strategic priorities and sector trends, improving assessment quality and inclusivity, embedding AI and digital fluency, strengthening student partnership, expanding skills and employability, and supporting research‑led, future‑ready learning pathways.
1. Programme portfolio development, interdisciplinarity and market alignment
- Design future‑focused, academically robust programmes that respond to institutional priorities, sector trends and the needs of distinct learner groups.
- Develop interdisciplinary routes, joint degrees and cross‑school pathways aligned with market expectations and emerging disciplines.
- Scale and sustain new course launches through appropriate staffing, estate planning and systems readiness.
- Conduct structured curriculum reviews to ensure coherence, progression, appropriate optionality and benchmarking against sector standards.
- Expand cross‑school optional modules to widen choice and interdisciplinary learning.
2. Assessment strategy, diversification, load management and feedback quality
- Diversify assessment formats to reduce reliance on high‑stakes exams and promote authenticity, inclusivity and disciplinary relevance.
- Systematically manage assessment load across programmes and year groups to ensure fair distribution and reduce over‑assessment.
- Strengthen quality assurance and moderation through peer review of assessment documents, standardised briefs and rubrics, and auditable processes.
- Enhance exam‑checking processes, including GTA review of online tests and earlier release of generic exam feedback.
- Maintain or work toward the ≤20‑working‑day marking turnaround expectation.
- Improve feedback literacy for staff and students through glossaries, sample assignments, clearer expectations and CPD.
- Align assessment documentation and expectations with professional guidance and accreditation requirements.
3. AI, digital fluency and flexible delivery
- Integrate AI literacy and digital fluency within curricula and assessment design.
- Undertake AI audits to map where AI appears in learning and assessment, ensuring clarity, consistency and equitable access.
- Provide guidance on acceptable AI use, ethical considerations and GenAI‑responsive assessment design.
- Expand online, blended, asynchronous and hybrid modules to reduce participation barriers and support flexible learning pathways.
- Use inclusive Moodle templates, paperless learning and standardised VLE structures to improve clarity and parity for students.
- Continue developing AI‑focused modules and share examples of effective AI‑integrated practice across the institution.
4. Student voice, inclusion, wellbeing and co-creation
- Embed student partnership into curriculum development and assessment design through co‑creation, SSLC engagement and structured consultation.
- Refresh co‑created marking criteria, briefs and assessment guidance in collaboration with students.
- Strengthen inclusive education by addressing diverse learner needs through tailored support, preventative mental‑health processes and coordinated EAP provision.
- Improve module‑feedback response rates and integrate feedback data more consistently into enhancement activity.
- Implement inclusive teaching and assessment practices informed by institutional inclusion initiatives.
5. Skills, employability, research culture and graduate readiness
- Embed academic, digital and professional skills across programmes, aligned with accreditation frameworks and industry expectations.
- Strengthen employability through curriculum‑integrated activities, clear skills articulation and targeted improvements for postgraduate taught learners.
- Build research culture through opportunities for undergraduate and postgraduate research engagement, research‑based modules and progression pathways to PGR study.
- Align curriculum and assessment design with industry needs, embedding ethical/critical AI, creative and experimental assessments, and clear preparatory pathways.
- Support graduate readiness through problem‑solving modules, advanced disciplinary pathways and stronger connections to real‑world research and professional practice.