Disclosure and Confidentiality

• Are LGBTQ+ individuals required to disclose information about their gender or sexual orientation that they might prefer to keep private?
• In line with the GDPR data minimisation principle, is any personal data collected limited to what is directly relevant and necessary for the specific purpose?
• Are there protections in place to ensure that any sensitive data disclosed is kept confidential and not shared without consent?

Outing and Privacy

• Could LGBTQ+ individuals be unintentionally 'outed' by requiring them to provide information about their identities, relationships, or personal lives?
• Are there safeguards to prevent outing of LGBTQ+ individuals?

Assumptions and Inclusivity

• What assumptions are being made about people’s identities, experiences, documentation (legal name or gender markers), relationships and family structures that might not apply equally to LGBTQ+ individuals?
• How can these assumptions be challenged, removed, or revised to be more inclusive?

Negative Consequences

• Are there any negative consequences that might disproportionately affect LGBTQ+ individuals, such as disciplinary actions, exclusion from opportunities, or increased scrutiny?
• How can these negative consequences be mitigated?

Barriers to Engagement

• Are there specific barriers that might prevent LGBTQ+ individuals from fully engaging or participating?
• How can these barriers be identified and removed to ensure equal access and full participation?

Sensitive Data Handling

• Is there a risk that data collected (such as legal sex markers, legal names, or emergency contact details for a partner) could be misused or lead to discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals?
• Are there clear guidelines on how sensitive data should be handled and protected?

Use of Correct Data

• Will chosen names, pronouns, and appropriate gendered or gender-neutral language be used consistently and respectfully?
• Are there procedures in place to update data/records promptly if a person’s chosen name or gender identity changes?

Gendered Language and Assumptions

• Does the policy or process make assumptions about gender that could exclude or misgender LGBTQ+ individuals?
• How can assumptions be avoided and language be made more inclusive to avoid assumptions about gender?

Public Sector Equality Duty

• Is unlawful behaviour under the Equality Act 2010 prevented or addressed, such as discrimination, harassment and victimisation?
• Does it promote positive interactions and understanding between LGBTQ+ individuals and those who do not share the same protected characteristics?
• Does it advance equal opportunities between LGBTQ+ individuals and those who do not share the same protected characteristics?

Equity of Benefits

• Are any benefits equally accessible to LGBTQ+ individuals, including those in same-sex relationships or with non-binary gender identities?
• Are there specific measures to ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals receive equitable treatment and support?

Training and Awareness

• Are staff adequately trained to understand and respect LGBTQ+ identities and issues?
• How will you ensure relevant ongoing education and awareness around LGBTQ+ inclusivity?

Enforcement and Accountability

• How will compliance be monitored and enforced to protect LGBTQ+ individuals?
• What mechanisms are in place to hold individuals accountable if the correct policy/processes are not followed?

Communication Strategies

• How will information be communicated to ensure it is accessible and reaches LGBTQ+ individuals effectively and sensitively?
• Are any communication materials inclusive, using language and imagery that reflect the diversity of the community?

Support Systems

• What support systems are available for LGBTQ+ individuals who might be negatively impacted?
• How will the University provide assistance to LGBTQ+ individuals in navigating any challenges posed by this policy?

Legal Compliance

• Does this work comply with institutional policies, and national and international laws protecting LGBTQ+ rights?
• Are there potential legal risks or liabilities associated with this work that could impact LGBTQ+ individuals?

  Ethical Standards

• Does this work uphold the University's values and ethical standards regarding equality, diversity, and inclusion?
• Are there values-based or ethical considerations that need to be addressed to prevent harm to LGBTQ+ individuals?

Mental Health Impact

• Could this work negatively impact the mental health and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ individuals?
• What resources are available to support the mental health needs of LGBTQ+ students and staff affected by this work?

Feedback Mechanisms

• How can LGBTQ+ individuals provide feedback on this work?
• Are there safe and confidential ways for LGBTQ+ individuals to share their experiences and concerns, including via trusted contacts or representatives?

Continuous Improvement

• How will the university use feedback from LGBTQ+ individuals to improve?
• Are there regular reviews scheduled to assess the effectiveness of this work in promoting LGBTQ+ inclusion and to address any negative impacts?

LGBTQ+ Consultation

• Have LGBTQ+ individuals and their representatives been consulted in the development or review of this work?
• How has their feedback been incorporated into the final version?

Inclusive Participation

• Were LGBTQ+ individuals given equal opportunity to participate in the consultation process?
• Are there mechanisms to ensure that a diverse range of LGBTQ+ voices are heard and considered?

Inclusive Policy Design

• Were LGBTQ+ inclusivity considerations integrated into the initial design and development of this work?
• How does the work ensure that it meets the specific needs of LGBTQ+ individuals from the outset?

Ongoing Monitoring

• How will the impact of this work on LGBTQ+ individuals be monitored over time?
• What indicators or metrics will be used to assess its effectiveness, positive and negative impacts, and to identify areas for improvement?

  Intersectional Approach

• Does the policy or process consider the intersection of LGBTQ+ identities with other protected characteristics (e.g. race, disability, religion)?
• How are the unique experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals with multiple marginalised identities addressed?

• Does the work consider the diverse spectrum within the LGBTQ+ community, including but not limited to different sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions?
• Are there specific efforts to include underrepresented groups within the LGBTQ+ community in the development and implementation?

The Queering University programme's resource library offers further resources on a wide range of topics to support those wishing to engage with LGBTQUIA+ inclusive practices.