Edward Summers (UG)

George Roffe (UG)

Matthew Jenkins (UG)

Joshua Opara (UG)

Hana Lawrie (UG)

Daniel Treherne (UG)

Accuracy

5- Perfectly accurate, remains true to historical fact in plot, set, costume etc, no or very little mistakes or inaccuracies

4- Good historical accuracy, largely true to historical fact, any anachronisms are intentional or serve a purpose

3 - Fairly historically accurate, creates a solid understanding of the historical period/events in question but with inaccuracies or missing details

2- Some historical accuracy, gives an idea of true historical events, several inaccuracies or mistakes

1 - Not at all historically accurate, very loosely based in reality, multiple inaccuracies/anachronisms

Entertainment

5- Excellent quality, great script and acting, highly enjoyable and entertaining, would rewatch and recommend to others

4- Very good quality, good script and acting, enjoyable and entertaining, would recommend to others

3- Good quality, solid script and decent acting, easy to watch and understand, fairly enjoyable

2- Okay quality, alright script and acting, somewhat complicated or boring, little entertainment value

1- Poor quality, bad script and acting, no enjoyment or education, too boring or over complicated, would not re-watch

Accuracy

5- Highly detailed historical elements, that rarely, if at all, deviate from the source material.

4- Mostly grounded in primary and secondary material. Deviation allowed from accuracy when in relevance to gameplay.

3- Has a good balance of historical accurate and fictionalised elements. Characters are relatively accurate to the source material, but may deviate for entertainment values.

2- Limited relevance to historical records/evidence. Historical figures may have fictionalised aspects but retain some historical accuracy.

1- No relevance to historical records/evidence. Historical figures/setting may be entirely fictionalised.

Enjoyment

5- Excellent game of highest quality. High replayability, with well developed mechanics to supplement quality gameplay. Minimal faults.

4- Well made game. Draws the player in, and rich in gameplay. May leave some things to be desire however this by no means decreases satisfaction.

3- Reasonably satisfying to play. Gameplay has some problems, however these can be overlooked to an extent.

2- Gameplay functions, but provides little satisfaction. The game is of moderate quality, however more would be expected for higher tiers.

1- Gameplay barely functions. Unengaging, and low quality.

Accuracy

5- Highly detailed historical elements, that rarely, if at all, deviate from the source material.

4- Mostly grounded in primary and secondary material. Deviation allowed from accuracy when in relevance to narrative.

3- Has a good balance of historical accurate and fictionalised elements. Characters are relatively accurate to the source material but may deviate for entertainment values.

2- Limited relevance to historical records/evidence. Historical figures may have fictionalised aspects but retain some historical accuracy.

1- No relevance to historical records/evidence. Historical figures/setting may be entirely fictionalised.

Enjoyment

5- Excellent book of highest quality. High readability, with well-developed characters to supplement a quality narrative. Minimal faults.

4- A decent book. Draws the reader in, and rich in prose. May leave some things to be desire however this by no means decreases satisfaction.

3- Reasonably satisfying to read. Writing has some problems; however these can be overlooked to an extent.

2- The book is somewhat readable, but provides little satisfaction. The text is of moderate quality, however, more would be expected for higher tiers.

1- Book is poorly written. Unengaging, and low quality.