Wages for Housework
Week 5
Questions to ponder whilst you read…
- Were the debates on domestic labour effective in responding to the ‘realities’ of women’s lives?
- What problems might feminists have with the wages for housework campaign?
- What parallels and differences can you identify between these debates and discussions of domesticity in the nineteenth-century?
- Should feminists employ cleaners?
Core Reading
Mariarosa Dalla Costa & S. James, 'Women and the Subversion of the Community' (1973) available at The Commoner 15 (Winter 2012) [online open access]
Silvia Federici, 'Wages Against Housework' (1974) available at The Commoner 15 (Winter 2012) [online open access]
Further Reading
Sarah Stoller, 'Forging a Politics of Care: Theorising Household Work in the British Women's Liberation Movement', History Workshop Journal (Spring, 2018), volume 85. [a historical examinations of this debate]
Victoria Bazin, 'Red Rag Magazine, Feminist Economics and the Domestic Labour Pains of Liberation', Women: a Cultural Review 32:3-4 (2021), 295-317 [another historical examination of the debate]
Various writings on housework in M. Rowe (ed.), Spare Rib Reader: 100 Issues of Women’s Liberation (1982)
Kaluzynska,. ‘Wiping the Floor with Theory: A Survey of Writing on Housework.’ Feminist Review 6 (1980), 27-54 [Useful overview of the debates in Britain,pay attention to the cartoons too!]
Anne Oakley, Housewife (1974) [Chapter 9. ‘Breaking the Circle’]
Barbara Ehrenreich, ‘Maid to Order’, http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/maidtoorder.htm [provides useful overview of 1970s debates and links them to issues today]
B. Ehrenreich, Global Women: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy (2004)
K. Weeks, The Problem with Work (2012), pp.113-136
Article on housework in R. Baxandall & L. Gordon (ed.s) Dear Sisters: Dispatches from the Women’s Liberation Movement (2000) [US perspective]
Angela Y. Davis, ‘The Approaching Obsolescence of Housework: A Working-Class Perspective’, in Women, Race and Class (1981) [From the US perspective, offering an important Black feminist critique]