Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
The Department of Economics at the University of Warwick has an active Microeconomic Theory Research Group, with a weekly external seminar, a weekly internal workshop, and high quality PhD students. We also organise international conferences on campus, or in Venice.
Our activities
CRETA Seminars in Economic Theory
Wednesday: 4-5.30pm
Since its creation in 2006, CRETA has run a seminar series with external and internal talks on economic theory and applications. For a detailed scheduled of speakers please follow the link below:
Organisers: Daniele Condorelli and Costas Cavounidis
Micro Theory Work in Progress (MIWP) Workshop
Thursday: 1-2pm
For faculty and PhD students at Warwick and other top-level academic institutions across the world. For a detailed scheduled of speakers please follow the link below.
Organiser: Agustin Troccoli-Moretti
People
Academics
Academics associated with the Microeconomic Theory Research Group are:
Events
CRETA Seminar - Catherine Bobtcheff
Catherine will present a paper co-authored with David Alary (Toulouse School of Economics) and Carole Haritchabalet (Université de Pau) entitled “Organizing insurance supply for new and undiversifiable risks”.
The abstract is the following: “This paper explores how insurance companies can coordinate to extend their joint capacity for the coverage of new and undiversifiable risks. The undiversifiable nature of such risks causes a shortage of insurance capacity and their limited knowledge makes learning and information sharing necessary. In practice, organizing such insurance supply amounts to sharing a common value divisible good between capacity constrained and privately informed insurers with a reserve price. Widely used ad-hoc co-insurance agreements out to operate as a uniform price auction with an ``exit/re-entry'' option. We compare it to a discriminatory auction, another auction present in the insurance industry. Both auction formats lead to different coverage/premium tradeoffs. If at least one insurer provides an optimistic expertise about the risk, ad-hoc co-insurance agreements offer higher coverage. This result is reversed when all insurers are pessimistic about the risk. Static comparative results with respect to the severity of the capacity constraints and the reserve price are provided. In the case of completely new risks, a regulator aiming at maximizing the expected coverage should promote ad-hoc co-insurance agreements when the reserve price is low enough or when capacity constraints are large enough.”
