Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Experimental and Behavioural Economics

Experimental and Behavioural Economics

The Experimental and Behavioural Economics Research Group (EBERG) draws its membership from economists based at the Economics Department at Warwick who work in the fields of Experimental Economics, Behavioural Economics and/or Subjective Wellbeing (“Happiness Economics”). Experimental methods are used in many fields of economics, including behavioural economics, public economics, labour economics, political economy, game theory, and financial economics. Behavioural economics is an attempt to understand decision-making in the context of the many psychological, cognitive and emotional factors that influence behaviour. Behavioural economists typically build on traditional economic models with insights from psychology or neuroscience. Since behavioural economics concerns the underlying motivations for behaviour it can be hard (though not impossible) to find data to support or develop behavioural theories without the use of experimental methods which explains the close relationship between the two fields.

Experimental and behavioural research are fundamentally interdisciplinary and this is reflected in the fact that the group is linked to other similar groups across the University of Warwick and beyond. DR@W is the overarching interdisciplinary group of all behavioural scientists in Warwick which, together with EBERG, also takes members from the Behavioural Science Group at Warwick Business School and behavioural and experimental psychologists based in the Psychology Department, and hosts a weekly seminar, the DR@W Forum. Many members of EBERG are also affiliated with Bridges, an interdisciplinary centre that includes behavioural and experimental work in its remit that also hosts regular seminars and workshops. Behaviour, Brain and Society is one of the University of Warwick’s global research priorities (GRPs) and the co-ordinator of EBERG sits on the board of the GRP. Several group members are actively involved in the ESRC CAGE centre. Theme 3 of CAGE is led by the co-ordinator of EBERG and has a special focus on subjective wellbeing.

People

Academics

Academics associated with the Reseach Group Name research group are:


Ludovica Gazze

Co-ordinator

Matthew Ridley

Deputy Co-ordinator


Events

Select tags to filter on
  Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
Thu 19 Feb, '26
-
EBER Seminar - Rafael Jimenez-Duran (Stanford)
S2.79

Title: AI Sycophancy

Coauthors: Giulia Caprini and Samuel Goldberg

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are said to exhibit sycophancy, a tendency to agree with users irrespective of the truth. We propose an economic framework that defines sycophancy as a preference for user approval, and develop an outcome-based sufficient statistic to detect it. Our identification strategy exploits a key architectural feature of LLMs: they are stateless, and "memory" of past interactions is constructed by summarizing conversations into short profiles appended to each new prompt. Because this memory can be controlled, toggled, and varied experimentally, we can isolate the causal path from user feedback to sycophantic behavior. We instrument the LLM's perceived cost of disagreement with a one-word variation in simulated prior user feedback. In an experiment with leading LLMs across three domains (moral judgments, factual questions, and common misconceptions) we find evidence that LLMs are sycophantic. Sycophancy is larger in subjective domains where baseline accuracy is lower and is heterogeneous across models.

Thu 19 Feb, '26
-
DR@W/EBER Seminar: Rafael Jimenez-Duran (Stanford)
Economics S2.79

AI Sycophancy (Coauthors: Giulia Caprini and Samuel Goldberg)

Thu 19 Feb, '26
-
BERG (Behavioural Economics Reading Group)
S2.86
Thu 26 Feb, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Roel van Veldhuizen (Lund)
WBS 0.009

Gender Differences in Self-Promotion and Career Advice

Thu 26 Feb, '26
-
BERG (Behavioural Economics Reading Group)
S2.86
Thu 5 Mar, '26
-
WBS Distinguished Seminar Series: Mirta Galesic (Santa Fe Institute)
WBS 1.007

Dynamics of belief networks

Thu 5 Mar, '26
-
BERG (Behavioural Economics Reading Group)
S2.86
Thu 12 Mar, '26
-
DR@W Forum - Kai Barron (WZB)
Wolfson Research Exchange (Library)

Details TBC

Thu 12 Mar, '26
-
BERG (Behavioural Economics Reading Group)
S2.86
Thu 19 Mar, '26
-
BERG (Behavioural Economics Reading Group)
S2.86
Thu 30 Apr, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Marc Kaufmann (CEU)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Thu 7 May, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Erik Stuchly (Hamburg)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Thu 14 May, '26
-
DR@W/EBER Seminar - Katie Coffman (Harvard Business School)
Wolfson Research Exchange (Library)

Details TBC

Thu 21 May, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Andis Sofianos (Durham)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Thu 28 May, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Dr. Davide Pace (LMU)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Thu 4 Jun, '26
-
DR@W/EBER Seminar: Douglas Bernheim (Stanford)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Thu 11 Jun, '26
-
DR@W Forum: Marc Scholten (IADE)
Venue TBC

Details TBC

Placeholder

Let us know you agree to cookies