Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Applied Microeconomics

Applied Microeconomics

The Applied Microeconomics research group unites researchers working on a broad array of topics within such areas as labour economics, economics of education, health economics, family economics, urban economics, environmental economics, and the economics of science and innovation. The group operates in close collaboration with the CAGE Research Centre.

The group participates in the CAGE seminar on Applied Economics, which runs weekly on Tuesdays at 2:15pm. Students and faculty members of the group present their ongoing work in two brown bag seminars, held weekly on Tuesdays and Wednesdays at 1pm. Students, in collaboration with faculty members, also organise a bi-weekly reading group in applied econometrics on Thursdays at 1pm. The group organises numerous events throughout the year, including the Research Away Day and several thematic workshops.

Our activities

Work in Progress seminars

Tuesdays and Wednesdays 1-2pm

Students and faculty members of the group present their work in progress in two brown bag seminars. See below for a detailed scheduled of speakers.

Applied Econometrics reading group

Thursdays (bi-weekly) 1-2pm

Organised by students in collaboration with faculty members. See the Events calendar below for further details

People

Academics

Academics associated with the Applied Microeconomics Group are:


Natalia Zinovyeva

Co-ordinator

Jennifer Smith

Deputy Co-ordinator


Events

Show all calendar items

CAGE-AMES Workshop - Margot Belguise

- Export as iCalendar
Location: S2.79

Title: Utilitarian Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France (joint work with Yuchen Huang (Paris School of Economics and EHESS) and Zhexun Mo (Paris School of Economics and World Inequality Lab))

Abstract: Recent experimental evidence suggests that meritocratic ideals are mainly a Western phenomenon. Puzzlingly, the Chinese public do not differentiate between merit and luck-based inequalities, despite having highly meritocratic historical institutions. We run a redistribution experiment with elite university students in China and France, investigating two hypotheses: first, that Chinese respondents value meritocracy as a means rather than an end (“consequentialist” rather than “deontological” meritocrats); second, that they exhibit a greater status quo bias. Preliminary results indicate that although Chinese respondents systematically redistribute less than the French, they behave, like French respondents, as deontological meritocrats, implementing more redistribution when merit differences are small or hard to determine. A large part of the overall difference in redistribution is driven by greater reluctance to change the status quo in the Chinese sample. We further show that the Chinese status quo conformity is driven by children of public servants, workers and farmers, but is nearly non-existent for children of private enterprise owners. Finally, we construct and estimate a structural model of distribution choice under conformism, to disentangle preferred distributions from implemented distributions.

Show all calendar items