Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Applied Microeconomics

Applied Microeconomics

The Applied Microeconomics research group unites researchers working on a broad array of topics within such areas as labour economics, economics of education, health economics, family economics, urban economics, environmental economics, and the economics of science and innovation. The group operates in close collaboration with the CAGE Research Centre.

The group participates in the CAGE seminar on Applied Economics, which runs weekly on Tuesdays at 2:15pm. Students and faculty members of the group present their ongoing work in two brown bag seminars, held weekly on Tuesdays and Wednesdays at 1pm. Students, in collaboration with faculty members, also organise a bi-weekly reading group in applied econometrics on Thursdays at 1pm. The group organises numerous events throughout the year, including the Research Away Day and several thematic workshops.

Our activities

Work in Progress seminars

Tuesdays and Wednesdays 1-2pm

Students and faculty members of the group present their work in progress in two brown bag seminars. See below for a detailed scheduled of speakers.

Applied Econometrics reading group

Thursdays (bi-weekly) 1-2pm

Organised by students in collaboration with faculty members. See the Events calendar below for further details

People

Academics

Academics associated with the Applied Microeconomics Group are:


Natalia Zinovyeva

Co-ordinator

Jennifer Smith

Deputy Co-ordinator


Events

Show all calendar items

Applied Economics, Econometrics & Public Policy (CAGE) Seminar - Julien Labonne (Oxford)

- Export as iCalendar
Location: S2.79

Title: Campaigning Against Populism: Emotions and Information in Real Election Campaigns (with Cesi Cruz and Francesco Trebbi).

 Abstract:

Across the world, politics is dominated by populists who are adept at using new forms of campaigning to reach citizens directly and spread, often through emotional appeals, their ideology. The challenge for mainstream parties has been how to articulate policy platforms and campaign promises in this new context. In particular, do forms of campaigning used by populist politicians -- direct in-person appeals and emotional messaging -- work for programmatic and platform-based politicians as well? We implement a field experiment during the 2019 Philippine Senate election with a mainstream opposition party to explore the effectiveness of: (i) their door-to-door visits delivering policy platform information to assess the role of direct appeals; (ii) the addition of explicit emotional messaging in mediating these interactions. We show that direct appeals and emotional messaging foster increased engagement with the campaign in the short term, but that over time the in-person policy information is more relevant in driving vote choice for programmatic parties, even when facing populist incumbents. The treatments operated through a persuasion channel, as treated voters were more likely to know the party, more certain, and gave higher ratings to the party's quality and proposed policies.

 

Show all calendar items