Skip to main content Skip to navigation

Political Economy and Public Economics

Political Economy and Public Economics

The Department of Economics at the University of Warwick has an active Political Economy and Public Economics (PEPE) Research Group. These two disciplines have natural complementarities. Political Economy focuses more on the political feasibility of certain policies by looking at which policies are more likely to enjoy public support and thus succeed in an electoral contest. Public economics looks more at determining which policies are optimal in every environment, but is less concerned about their political approval or feasibility.

Recent world events such as the public backlash against globalization and inequality have raised awareness for the need for more integration between these two approaches as political resistance to the adoption of potentially beneficial policies has become ever more salient. Hence by their very nature these two disciplines transcend traditional field divisions such as micro and macroeconomics: they use theoretical, empirical and experimental methods to obtain conclusions, thus generating synergies with various other groups in our department from development to experimental to history to macroeconomics to economic theory.

Our activities

PEPE Research Group Seminar

Thursday: 11.15am-12.30pm
A weekly seminar is organised that brings top economists and political scientist speakers every week for a double-feature seminar in coordination with the LSE.

For a detailed scheduled of speakers please follow the link below:

https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/seminars/seminars/political-economy 

Organisers: Michela Redoano and Mateusz Stalinski

PEPE Research Group Annual Conference

In collaboration with colleagues from Princeton and Yale, and with the support of CEPR, the PEPE Research Group organises an annual conference which has become a central meeting of political economists in Europe. Having taken place in previous years in Venice and Rome, it attracts over 70 delegates attending from leading institutions in the US, EU and the UK. Every year, several of our PhD students get to participate in a fully funded conference with an opportunity to engage with leading scholars.

Find out more about this year's conference which will take place 26-27 April 2024 in Rome.

Organisers: Helios Herrera, Mateusz Stalinski

People

Academics

Academics associated with the Reseach Group Name research group are:


Michela Redoano

Co-ordinator

Helios Herrera

Deputy Co-ordinator

Events

Previous events   More events Jump to any date

How do I use this calendar?

You can click on an event to display further information about it.

The toolbar above the calendar has buttons to view different events. Use the left and right arrow icons to view events in the past and future. The button inbetween returns you to today's view. The button to the right of this shows a mini-calendar to let you quickly jump to any date.

The dropdown box on the right allows you to see a different view of the calendar, such as an agenda or a termly view.

If this calendar has tags, you can use the labelled checkboxes at the top of the page to select just the tags you wish to view, and then click "Show selected". The calendar will be redisplayed with just the events related to these tags, making it easier to find what you're looking for.

 
Wed 9 Nov, '22
-
CAGE-AMES Workshop - Prateek Bhan
S2.79 via MS Teams

Title: DO ROLE MODELS INCREASE STUDENT HOPE AND EFFORT? EVIDENCE FROM INDIA

Abstract:

This paper offers experimental evidence on the significance of role models on fostering hope, increasing effort and improving the academic performance of primary school students in India. Students from private schools in Jaipur were randomised at an individual level to a treatment or a placebo group. Treated students watch a short film produced in Jaipur, as a part of the experiment. The placebo group students watch a television show for kids, ‘Malgudi Days’. This intervention increases student hope by 0.17 standard deviation (s.d.) and effort by 0.26 s.d. Along with hope, I find significant improvements in students’ self-efficacy or optimism and happiness that are sustained in the medium run. While learning outcomes do not change immediately, the one-off treatment leads to a 0.16 s.d. increase on standardised test scores in English, six-weeks after the intervention with no effect on Mathematics. A cost-effectiveness analysis highlights role models as a promising intervention tool that can have an effect on student motivation and their learning outcomes.

Wed 9 Nov, '22
-
CRETA Seminar - Mark Whitmeyer (ASU)
S2.79

Title:Buying Opinions

 Abstract: A principal hires an agent to acquire soft information about an unknown state. Even though neither how the agent learns (the experiment chosen by the agent) nor what the agent discovers (the realization of the experiment) are contractible, the principal is unconstrained as to what information the agent can be induced to acquire and report honestly. When the agent is risk neutral, and a) is not asked to learn too much, b) can acquire information sufficiently cheaply, or c) can face sufficiently large penalties, the principal can attain the first-best outcome. Risk aversion (by the agent) introduces inefficiencies: the first-best is unattainable, though whether the agent obtains rents depends on whether he may exit to take his outside option after learning.

Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
Spatial-Urban Reading Group: Introductory Meeting
S1.69
Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
PEPE (Political Economy & Public Economics) Seminar - Erik Snowberg (Utah)
S2.79

Title: An Organizational Theory of State Capacity (with Mike Ting, Columbia)

Abstract: A burgeoning literature recognizes that the efficacy of the state is crucial for economic growth and citizen welfare. However, much of that literature abstracts away from the institutional details underlying state capacity. We develop a theory that provides a working definition of state capacity---the ability to handle administrative problems of varying complexity, such as tax collection---and how it is provided and maintained. We conceive of the state as a knowledge hierarchy, or an information-processing institution that passes problems up a set of organizational layers until a layer with the required expertise solves it. Knowledge hierarchies are costly to establish and operate, and politicians differ in policy preferences and public goods valuations. We embed this structure in a simple political economy framework, where politicians may idle parts of the state depending on electoral prospects, thus reducing output. In conjunction with high partisanship, this gives the state designer incentives to distort the state away from efficient levels of capacity and specialization.

Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
CAGE Research Away Day
Radcliffe House

This year’s CAGE Research Away Day will be held on November 10th, 1-5pm in Radcliffe House (the provisional program can be found here). The aim of this event is for our faculty and associated academics to present recent work related to CAGE's themes, in an informal setting allowing for feedback and discussion. If you would like to attend the event (in part or for the whole half day), please register with Josh Allen at cage.centre@warwick.ac.uk.

Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
MIWP (Microeconomics Work in Progress) - Hyungmin Park (PGR)
S2.79 via MS Teams
Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
Macro/International Seminar - Pamela Medina-Quispe (Toronto)
S2.79

Title: Labor Market Power, Self-Employment, and Development

Thu 10 Nov, '22
-
Behavioural and Experimental Reading Group
S2.79
Mon 14 Nov, '22
-
Econometrics Seminar - Emmanuel Guerre (Queen Mary)
S2.79

Nonparametric identification of first-price auction with unobserved competition: a density discontinuity framework (joint with Yao Luo (University of Toronto))

Abstract: We consider nonparametric identification of independent private value first-price auction models, in which the analyst only observes winning bids. Our benchmark model assumes an exogenous number of bidders N. We show that, if the bidders observe N, the resulting discontinuities in the winning bid density can be used to identify the distribution of N. The private value distribution can be nonparametrically identified in a second step.

This extends, under testable identification conditions, to the case where N is a number of potential buyers, who bid with some unknown probability. Identification also holds in presence of additive unobserved heterogeneity drawn from some parametric distributions. A last class of extensions deals with cartels which can change size across auctions due to varying bidder cartel membership. Identification still holds if the econometrician observes winner identities and winning bids, provided a (unknown) bidder is always a cartel member. The cartel participation probabilities of other bidders can also be identified. An application to USFS timber auction data illustrates the usefulness of discontinuities to analyze bidder participation.

The paper can be find here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.05476.pdf

 

Tue 15 Nov, '22
-
MIEW (Macro/International Economics Workshop) - Thomas Rowley (Visiting PhD student)
S2.79

Title: Domestic Superstars vs. Superstar FDI: Granular Comparative Advantage and Micro Implications

Tue 15 Nov, '22
-
CWIP (CAGE Work in progress) - Ao Wang
S2.79 via MS Teams
Tue 15 Nov, '22
-
Applied Economics, Econometrics & Public Policy (CAGE) Seminar - Maddalena Ronchi (Bocconi)
S2.79

Title: Female representation and talent allocation in entrepreneurship: the role of early exposure to entrepreneurs

Abstract: Women are highly under-represented in entrepreneurship in all OECD countries, raising concerns both from a gender equality and an aggregate productivity perspective. Using registry data from Denmark, we follow one million individuals from adolescence into adulthood to study whether higher exposure to entrepreneurs during adolescence can improve female representation and talent allocation in entrepreneurship. We exploit within-school, across-cohort variation in adolescents' exposure to entrepreneurship, as measured by the share of their peers whose parents are entrepreneurs during the last years of compulsory schooling. We find that higher exposure to entrepreneurs during adolescence encourages girls' entry and tenure into this profession. The effect is driven by exposure to the parents of female peers and works via a decrease in girls' likelihood to discontinue education at the end of compulsory schooling and to hold low-paying jobs as adults. The increase in female entrepreneurship is associated with the creation of firms that are larger and survive for longer than the average firm, indicating that early exposure improves the allocation of talent in entrepreneurship by reducing women's entry barriers to this profession. Our results suggest that such barriers are both cultural and informational in nature and that raising women's early exposure to entrepreneurship from the 25th to the 75th percentile would increase the total number of jobs created by entrepreneurs by 5.3%.

Wed 16 Nov, '22
-
CAGE-AMES Workshop - Sarthak Joshi
S2.79

Title: Study design: Can improving teacher’s wellbeing improve student outcomes? Experimental evidence from Jordan

Abstract: Since the onset of the Syrian crisis in 2011, Jordan has been host to one of the largest refugee populations in the world. Although the inflow of refugees has slowed recently, there are concerns that Jordan’s government school system is under considerable stress, limiting its ability to deliver high-quality education. Teachers’ wellbeing is of particular concern since they increasingly manage overcrowded classrooms in double shift schools often with children who have faced severe trauma. In response to these challenges, the Jordanian Ministry of Education is launching a teacher training intervention aimed at improving teacher’s emotional and occupational wellbeing. The present study is an experimental evaluation of this program. The main outcomes of interests are teacher wellbeing, teaching quality, student wellbeing, and student learning. The intervention will be launched in February 2024, with the endline survey planned in June 2024.

Wed 16 Nov, '22
-
Teaching & Learning Seminar - Swati Virmani (De Montfort)
S0.18

Title to be advised

Organised by Subhasish Dey

Wed 16 Nov, '22
-
CRETA Seminar - Mengxi Zhang (Bonn)
S2.79

Title: Optimal Insurance: Dual Utility, Random Losses and Adverse Selection (joint with Alex Gershkov, Benny Moldovanu and Philipp Strack)

Abstract: We study a generalization of the classical monopoly insurance problem under adverse selection where we allow for a random distribution of losses, possibly correlated with the agent's risk parameter that is private information. Our main purpose is to provide a convenient analytical model that explains both the pattern of observed customer behavior and the pattern of insurance contracts most often observed in practice: these consist of menus of several deductible-premium pairs, or menus of insurance with coverage limits- premium pairs. The main departure from the classical insurance literature is obtained here by endowing the agents with risk-averse preferences that can be represented by a dual utility functional.

Thu 17 Nov, '22
-
PEPE (Political Economy & Public Economics) Seminar - Anderson Frey (Rochester)
S2.79

Title: The Politicization of Bureaucrats: Evidence from Brazil ​(with Rogerio Santarrosa)

Abstract: In developing countries incumbents commonly exercise political influence over bureaucrats through monitoring or patronage hiring. We investigate a new politicization channel: a phenomenon where bureaucrats join political parties while in office. First, with a regression discontinuity design and administrative data on the universe of Brazilian municipal bureaucrats, we identify an incumbency advantage in their politicization. Second, we find larger effects for a special set of bureaucrats: 55,000 interviewers enrolling households into Bolsa Família (BF). Third, we show that these effects are even stronger for interviewers highly exposed to voters; in municipalities where BF was expanded; and in administrations connected to PT’s federal government, BF’s creator. The Brazilian context and this evidence together suggest that the following logic might drive this politicization: policy‐driven interactions with voters allow bureaucrats to accumulate political capital – either due to good performance or capture – which is converted into rents by joining the incumbent political networks.

Thu 17 Nov, '22
-
Econometrics/Labour Reading Group
S2.77 Cowling Room

The title of the paper: "What’s Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature" (Jonathan Roth, Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna, Alyssa Bilinski, John Poe), presented by Carmen Villa.

 

Thu 17 Nov, '22
-
Macro/International Seminar - Miguel Leon-Ledesma (Kent)
S2.79

Title: (Endogenous) Growth Slowdowns

Abstract: We present a model where temporary shocks can lead to permanent changes in the rate of growth of total factor productivity (TFP). The model features matching between basic research and development within an expanding variety semi-endogenous growth model. Search externalities generate vicious and virtuous research cycles. The model has a unique equilibrium path but multiple balanced growth paths (BGPs). After a long-lived or deep financial shock, the economy can transit between these BGPs, generating “super-hysteresis” in TFP. We analyze the model in the context of the Japanese growth slowdown and show that it can explain almost all of the TFP growth decline after the financial crisis in the early 1990s. Demographic shocks combined with a long-lasting financial crisis proved to be the “wretched coincidence” that led to the growth slowdown.

Thu 17 Nov, '22
-
Behavioural and Experimental Reading Group
S2.79
Mon 21 Nov, '22
-
Econometrics Seminar - Stephane Bonhomme (Chicago)
S2.79

Title: Relaxing Strict Exogeneity in Nonlinear Panel Data Models, joint with Kevin Dano and Bryan Graham

Tue 22 Nov, '22
-
CWIP (CAGE Work in progress) - Ben Lockwood and Wiji Arulampalam
S2.79 via MS Teams

Two workshops:

CWIP 1: 1-2pm, Ben Lockwood - Small Firm Growth and the VAT Threshold: Evidence for the UK

CWIP 2: 2:15-3:15pm, Wiji Arulampalam - Changing body weight of adolescents in Great Britain: The role of fast-food (Joint work with Yu Aoki & Sushil Mathew).

This workshop is hybrid, here is a Teams link . https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_OWE3ZDAyNWYtYTgzMS00NTUxLWI2ZDktMWYxZjFkYjQyZTUy%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2209bacfbd-47ef-4465-9265-3546f2eaf6bc%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22d235acba-bb89-4eff-a07c-515e0b711c79%22%7d

Wed 23 Nov, '22
-
Teaching & Learning Seminar - Lory Barile, Neil Lloyd, Ram Govindaswamy (Warwick)
S0.18

Title: Understanding Engagement and Performance of Social Mobility Students

Speaker: Lory Barile, Neil Lloyd and Ramkumar Govindaswamy

Abstract: One of the guiding principles to inclusive education is to improve participation and outcomes for all students and ensure that all students are able to achieve their potential. Effective data monitoring is key to this and to ensure that change is transformative and sustained. This study extends the existing literature on ‘mobilities in Higher Education ’ by looking at the extent to which Economics students from social mobility backgrounds at the University of Warwick engage and perform within their programme of studies. The paper will provide a contribution to the literature by:

1) Analysing the relationship between student engagement and performance using a Revealed Preferences Approach and considering a) how students’ characteristics (e.g., socioeconomic and pre-university performance) affect students’ (online and in-person) engagement and b) how this links to students’ performance.

2) Investigating how different types of assessments (e.g., MCQ, Essays, Group tasks) impact engagement and performance.

Organised by Subhasish Dey

Wed 23 Nov, '22
-
CRETA Seminar - Weijie Zhong (Stanford)
S2.79

Title: Martingale Embeddings: Theory and Applications.

Thu 24 Nov, '22
-
Spatial-Urban Reading Group
S1.50

We will discuss the paper "Structural Estimation in Urban Economics" by Holmes and Sieg. Gabriele Guaitoli will lead the discussion.

Thu 24 Nov, '22
-
PEPE (Political Economy & Public Economics) Seminar - Diana Moreira (UC Davis)
S2.79 via MS Teams

Who Benefits from Meritocracy? (with Santiago Pérez)

Does screening applicants using exams help or hurt the chances of lower-SES candidates? Because individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds fare, on average, worse than those from richer backgrounds in standardized tests, a common concern with this “meritocratic” approach is that it might have a negative impact on the opportunities of lower-SES individuals.
However, an alternative view is that, even if such applicants underperformed on exams, other (potentially more discretionary and less impersonal) selection criteria might put them at an even worse disadvantage. We investigate this question using evidence from the 1883 Pendleton Act, a landmark reform in American history which introduced competitive exams to select
certain federal employees. Using newly assembled data on the socioeconomic backgrounds of government employees and a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that, although the reform increased the representation of “educated outsiders” (individuals with high education but limited connections), it reduced the share of lower-SES individuals. This decline was driven by
a higher representation of the middle class, with little change in the representation of upper class applicants. The drop in the representation of lower-SES workers was stronger among applicants from states with more unequal access to schooling as well as in offices that relied more heavily on connections prior to the reform. These findings suggest that, although using
exams could help select more qualified candidates, these improvements can come with the cost of increased elitism.

This seminar will be hybrid format via MS Teams.

Click here to join the meeting<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_NjExOWVhZTAtNTY4MC00OWUwLWEyYWQtYTcxOGY3NmE1YzAy%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2209bacfbd-47ef-4465-9265-3546f2eaf6bc%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%229f3e7b84-305e-496a-b9de-8c9ca74b3237%22%7d>

 

Thu 24 Nov, '22
-
MIWP (Microeconomics Work in Progress) - Agustin Troccoli Moretti
S2.79
Thu 24 Nov, '22
-
Macro/International Seminar - Annika Bacher (BI Norwegian Business School)
S2.79

Title: to be advised

Christine Braun is hosting this visit.

Thu 24 Nov, '22
-
Behavioural and Experimental Reading Group
S2.79
Mon 28 Nov, '22
-
Economic History Workshop - Claudia Steinwender (LMU)

Title: Omina Juncta in Uno: Foreign Powers and Trademark Protection in Shanghai's Concession Era (with Laura Alfaro, Cathy Bao, Maggie X. Chen, Junjie Hong)

Mon 28 Nov, '22
-
Econometrics Seminar - Jean-Jacques Fomeron (Boston University)
S2.79

Title: Noisy, Non-Smooth, Non-Convex Estimation of Moment Condition Models

Placeholder